Madison, NJ - Madison, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PAK Kaitlyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 61% | |
| 2 | BLUM Leah I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 48% | |
| 3 | WEBER Juliana I. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 23% | 4% |
| 3 | LI Amanda C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 26% | |
| 5 | KATZ Anat | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
| 6 | STONE Hava S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 15% | |
| 7 | GORMLEY Arwen E. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 8 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 14% |
| 9 | SHOMAN Miriam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 12% |
| 10 | NI Sharon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
| 11 | RIZKALA Joanna | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
| 12 | CANNON Sophia E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 52% | 10% | |
| 13 | HILD Nisha | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 20% | 2% | |
| 14 | SHOMAN Jenna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 57% | |
| 15 | SHIH Christina | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 16 | DOVE Tyanna | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 2% |
| 17 | LUKASHENKO Angelina | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 5% |
| 18 | WANG Jianning | 100% | 94% | 66% | 25% | 3% | - | |
| 19 | LEE Sophia | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 8% | - | |
| 20 | CHIANG Emily | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 10% | 1% | |
| 21 | DANK Dina | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
| 22 | LEVITIS Danielle | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
| 23 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
| 24 | BAKER Audrey C. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 25 | SHEN Jamie | 100% | 71% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
| 26 | GUZMAN Claudia | 100% | 96% | 73% | 27% | 4% | - | |
| 27 | BROWN Delaney | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 28 | YEPEZ Olivia R. | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 29 | MEDVEDEVA Alexandra | 100% | 79% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | O'HARA Eimile J. | 100% | 95% | 68% | 26% | 4% | - | |
| 31 | COLTER Aurora | 100% | 78% | 32% | 5% | - | - | |
| 32 | LEUNG Ashlyn K. | 100% | 93% | 59% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 33 | WALSHE Kira | 100% | 89% | 55% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 34 | NAYAK Anika | 100% | 85% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 35 | REN Xinling | 100% | 66% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | KRYLOVA Valery | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 37 | CHU Laura | 100% | 71% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 38 | HAQ Nylah | 100% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 39 | YI Felicia | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.