Richmond Fencing Club - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ISAACSON Bjorn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 27% | |
2 | FORMY DUVAL Christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 39% | |
3 | SHEYNKMAN Leon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 35% | |
3 | OTT James (Jimmy) P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
5 | DYER John G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 30% | |
6 | SMIGRODZKI Nymeria | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 9% | |
7 | PRICE Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 27% | 3% |
8 | LEWIS River | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
9 | GANDLURI Sreehitha | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 6% | |
10 | HAHM Samuel | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 25% | 3% | - |
11 | TOLENTINO SR. Francis | 100% | 77% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | |
12 | MAGGY Melanie D. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
13 | ZIMSKY James | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
14 | ANDERSON Sr. Danny R. | 100% | 93% | 64% | 23% | 3% | - | |
15 | ROUNTREE Andrew | 100% | 94% | 67% | 27% | 4% | - | |
16 | HARPER Wesley | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 23% | 2% | |
17 | POOLE Katherine | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | |
18 | BIELEWICZ Nicholas | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
19 | THOMAS Ryan | 100% | 68% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |
20 | SMITH IV Ted A. | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - | |
21 | TETTERTON Jr Joseph S. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
22 | SHEA Aleksander | 100% | 76% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - |
23 | SINGH Meet | 100% | 97% | 70% | 28% | 5% | - | |
24 | LAMBERT Luke | 100% | 89% | 54% | 16% | 1% | - | |
25 | NANAYAKKARA Sanuthi | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.