Madison, NJ - Madison, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ELSISSY Ziad A. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
| 2 | LOSS Geoffrey M. | V V V D V V | V V V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 3 | NADILE Henry V. | D V V V V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 3 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 5 | RAMPAZZO Luca | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 6 | +2.1 |
| 6 | REN Junming | V D V V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 7 | MICHELL Bailey | V V V V D D | V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 8 | WIND Nicky E. | V D D D D V | V V V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 9 | SMITH David C. | V V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 10 | GANTA Vijay | V V D V V V | V D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
| 11 | SHI Andrew | V D V V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 12 | YEN Darren | V V D V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 13 | ZU Kevin | D V V D V V | V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 14 | WOOD Elden S. | D V V V D | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 15 | SO Hananiah | D V D V V | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 16 | FRISHMAN Ethan J. | D D V D D D | V V D | 3.7 | 1 | -2.7 |
| 17 | KIM Minwook | V V V V V | D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 18 | WUN William | D V V V V | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 19 | RAI Avin | V D V V V | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 20 | BARNETT Adam | V V V D D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 21 | QUAN Nicholas | V V V D D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 22 | WU Mengke | D V V V D D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 23 | HAZLE-CARY Jacob P. | D V D D V V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 24 | GILES Jeremy M. | D V D D V | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 25 | LIU Kelly | V D V D D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 26 | YEN Preston | V D D D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 27 | CZAHA Balint | D V D V D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 28 | BUKOWSKI Bronson | V V D D D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 29 | LIN William | D V D D D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 30 | LEE Jude H. | V D D D D | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 31 | TALAAT Mohamed | V D D D D D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 32 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | D D D V D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 33 | EPSTEIN Henry N. | D V V D V V | D | 1.4 | 4 | +2.6 |
| 34 | QIU Le | D D V V V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 35 | MIKA Casper | D V V V D | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 36 | NG Jonathan H. | V D V V D D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 37 | NATANOV David I. | V D D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 38 | HUANG Eric | V D V D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 39 | ZHOU Miles | D D V V D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 40 | HONG Vincent Q. | D D D V V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 41 | CHO Brandon | V D V D D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 42 | TAKEMARU Leo | D D D V V D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 43 | TANG Brendan J. | D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 44 | MESHKOV Peter A. | D V D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 45 | CHAN Matthew | D D D D V | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 46 | MILGRAM Nathan A. | D D D D V | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 47 | FISK Ethan | V D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 48 | TRAVERS Samir T. | D D D D V D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 49 | BRAR Sanjeet | D V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 50 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
| 51 | XU Michael | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.