Dominican University New York - Orangeburg, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | YANG Emma | V D V V V | V V V V V | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 2 | MCSHERRY Ava | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 3 | SHENG Katherine | V V V D D | V V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 3 | WANG Joanna | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 5 | LI Eleanor | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 6 | PEVZNER Nicole | D V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 7 | LEVY Avery | D V D V V | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 8 | WANG Yudi | D D D D V V | V V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 9 | CHO Emily (Euran) | V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 10 | SHMAY Anastasia | V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 11 | SIMONOV Dasha | V D V V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 12 | WANG Amabel | V D V V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 13 | ROZPEDOWSKI Claire | D V V V V | V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 14 | SHA Yi Ling | V D V V D | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 15 | WANG Sabrina | D V V D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 16 | FIELD Elizabeth | D D D V V | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 17 | ZELDIN Nadia | V V V V D | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 18 | DIMATULAC Elise Ann | D D V V V V | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 19 | LI Han (Helina) | D V V V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 20 | BASILE Gianna | V V D D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 21 | MARTIRE Alessandra | D V D V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 22 | HARRIS Julia | V D D D V | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 23 | LEE Allison | V D D D V | D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
| 24 | BABIAC Julia | V D V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 24 | REZA Fukaina | V D V D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 26 | LIU Long | V V D D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 27 | BERGEL Daphne | V D V D D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 28 | CHEN Sophie | D V D D D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 29 | MAJID Inaaya | D D D D V | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 30 | SHERLOCK Gabriella | V D D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 31 | KAPRAN Anastasia | D V D D D D | V D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 32 | MCDERMOTT Catherine | D D D D D | V D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 33 | ZOLDAN Gweniveve A. | D D D D V | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 34 | LIU Jingyi (Eva) | D V D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 35 | TSIPORUKHA Sasha | D D D V D | D | 0.2 | 1 | +0.8 |
| 36 | HUANG Sophie | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 37 | OTTERMAN Jenna | D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.