Madison, NJ - Madison, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | GANTA Vijay | V V V D D V | V V V V V V | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
2 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
3 | MOSZCZYNSKI Adam | V V V V D V | V V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
3 | KIM Minwook | V V V V V D | V V V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
5 | ZU Kevin | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
6 | TRAVERS Samir T. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
7 | RAI Avin | V V D V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
8 | SMITH David C. | V V V V D D | V V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
9 | YAO Jonathan | V V V V V | V V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
10 | TAKEMARU Leo | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
11 | TRAVAGLIONE Conor D. | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
12 | ZHOU Miles | V V D V V | V V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
13 | BRAR Sanjeet | D V D V V V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
14 | OWENS William | V D V V D V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
15 | MORRILL Justin | V D V D V V | V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
16 | QUAN Nicholas | D D V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
17 | MORRILL William | V V V V D V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
17 | LASORSA Matthew | V V V D V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
19 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | V V D V V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
20 | CHAN Daniel | D V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
21 | CHAMBERS Amir E. | D D V V V V | V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
22 | SHI Andrew | V V D V D V | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
23 | MOSKOWITZ Mason C. | D V V V V D | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
24 | WILSON Jude | V V V D V D | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
25 | HONG Vincent Q. | V D D V V V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
26 | WUN William | V V V D D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
27 | WU Mengke | V D V V D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
28 | YEN Preston | D V D V V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
29 | LIN William | V D V D V D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
30 | CHAN Matthew | D V D D V V | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
31 | CHON Taylor A. | D D V V D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
32 | MORREALE John | V D D D V D | V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
33 | TANG Brendan J. | D D V V V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
34 | KEEFE Duncan | D D D V V V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
35 | TOPF Karl B. | D V V D D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
36 | CHO Brandon | D V V D D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
37 | TANG Albert | V D D D D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
38 | PARKHURST Jr Michael | V D V D D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
39 | HUANG Ethan F. | D D V V D D | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
40 | LEE Jude H. | V D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
40 | WOLIN Zachary | D D V D V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
42 | MICHNA Colin P. | D V D V D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
42 | HU Andrew | V D D V D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
44 | EPSTEIN Henry N. | D D D D V V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
45 | GOLD Jackson | V V D D D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
46 | XU William | D V D D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
47 | KURTZFREILICH Jake A. | V D D D D V | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
48 | EDELMAN Seth A. | V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
49 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | D D D D V | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
50 | XU Michael | V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
51 | CLAWSON Amzie | D D D V D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
52 | VAROQUA Tolby | D D V D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
53 | ANGKATAVANICH Owen | D D D D V D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
53 | TEVEBAUGH Andrew | D V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
55 | SHAO Peter | D D D V D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
56 | ZATZ Ben Z. | V D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
57 | HOEY-WASOW Henry | D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
58 | HENWOOD PJ | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
59 | HAQ Kamran R. | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
59 | GRYCIUK Koby | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
61 | LEUNG Andrew K. | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.