Madison, NJ - Madison, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GANTA Vijay | - | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 2 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 23% |
| 3 | MOSZCZYNSKI Adam | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 21% |
| 3 | KIM Minwook | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 38% |
| 5 | ZU Kevin | - | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
| 6 | TRAVERS Samir T. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
| 7 | RAI Avin | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% |
| 8 | SMITH David C. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 9 | YAO Jonathan | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | |
| 10 | TAKEMARU Leo | - | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 14% |
| 11 | TRAVAGLIONE Conor D. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% |
| 12 | ZHOU Miles | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | |
| 13 | BRAR Sanjeet | - | 3% | 25% | 42% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 14 | OWENS William | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 15 | MORRILL Justin | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 16 | QUAN Nicholas | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 17 | MORRILL William | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 3% |
| 17 | LASORSA Matthew | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% |
| 19 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 20 | CHAN Daniel | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | |
| 21 | CHAMBERS Amir E. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 42% | 15% |
| 22 | SHI Andrew | - | - | 3% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
| 23 | MOSKOWITZ Mason C. | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 24 | WILSON Jude | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 25 | HONG Vincent Q. | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 26 | WUN William | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% | |
| 27 | WU Mengke | 5% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 28 | YEN Preston | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
| 29 | LIN William | - | 1% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% |
| 30 | CHAN Matthew | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 31 | CHON Taylor A. | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 32 | MORREALE John | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% |
| 33 | TANG Brendan J. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
| 34 | KEEFE Duncan | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 35 | TOPF Karl B. | 2% | 15% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 36 | CHO Brandon | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 10% | |
| 37 | TANG Albert | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 38 | PARKHURST Jr Michael | 3% | 19% | 38% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 39 | HUANG Ethan F. | - | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 40 | LEE Jude H. | 6% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 40 | WOLIN Zachary | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 42 | MICHNA Colin P. | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 42 | HU Andrew | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 44 | EPSTEIN Henry N. | 12% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 45 | GOLD Jackson | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 46 | XU William | 11% | 37% | 35% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 47 | KURTZFREILICH Jake A. | - | 6% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 48 | EDELMAN Seth A. | 35% | 41% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 49 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | |
| 50 | XU Michael | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 51 | CLAWSON Amzie | 6% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 52 | VAROQUA Tolby | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | ANGKATAVANICH Owen | 9% | 41% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | TEVEBAUGH Andrew | 4% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 55 | SHAO Peter | 43% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 56 | ZATZ Ben Z. | 41% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 57 | HOEY-WASOW Henry | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 58 | HENWOOD PJ | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | HAQ Kamran R. | 36% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 59 | GRYCIUK Koby | 67% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 61 | LEUNG Andrew K. | 35% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.