Madison, NJ - Madison, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% |
| 2 | XUE Alanna | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 15% | |
| 3 | HUANG Natalie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 39% | 5% | |
| 3 | ACHILOVA Feyza | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 14% |
| 5 | SOLSKY Brooke A. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 6 | MCSHINE Katelyn H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 8% |
| 7 | MILLER Naomi E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 34% |
| 8 | WANG Ellen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
| 9 | HECKMANN Emma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 10 | FU Qihan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 20% | |
| 11 | LI Rachel Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 8% |
| 12 | WU Julianna Y. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 13 | SEGAL Lydia G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 6% |
| 14 | SHAW Kayla M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 46% | |
| 15 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 16 | NARANG Maya | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 17 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 36% | 6% | |
| 18 | MOY Kayla A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 42% | 7% |
| 19 | HOLLE Aviella S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 13% | |
| 20 | WEINTRAUB Io H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 23% | 4% |
| 21 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 9% |
| 22 | PAGES Melanie | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 23 | CHEN Georgia M. | 100% | 91% | 58% | 21% | 4% | < 1% | - |
| 24 | VEERKAMP Molly | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 26% | |
| 25 | SLASKI Caroline O. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 26 | SU Michelle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 26% | |
| 27 | YU Jaime L. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 31% | 6% | |
| 28 | BOODELL Ella | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 38% | 8% |
| 29 | BASSON Bayley D. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% | 18% | 2% | |
| 30 | TANG Ai Jia | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 31 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 32 | JENKINS Hannah G. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 33 | BHAN Zala | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 34 | BECKER Elena | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 9% |
| 35 | BECCHINA Claire E. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 36 | MUELLER Tatum J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
| 37 | WERBACH Esther | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 38 | KANIUK Rachel | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 13% | 1% | |
| 39 | LIU Sophia | 100% | 97% | 72% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 40 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 8% | 1% | |
| 41 | LAM Victoria M. | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 6% | - | |
| 42 | DRANOVSKY Dasha | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 6% |
| 43 | HEISER Anna M. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 44 | GINDE Maithili | 100% | 89% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 45 | JULIUS Sonia | 100% | 96% | 61% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 46 | GUTKOVSKAYA Nora | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | |
| 47 | DRESSEL Pamela (Pam) A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 22% |
| 48 | HUNT Abigail S. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 49 | ROHRING Anna L. | 100% | 49% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 50 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 51 | LAPPER Whitney P. | 100% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 52 | CHARALEL Jessica | 100% | 92% | 49% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 53 | SCHLOTTERBECK Abigail | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 54 | ZGOMBIC Emily | 100% | 86% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | CHEUNG Kaitlin | 100% | 68% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 56 | NICOU Melina | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 57 | MUTAKABBIR Assata | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 58 | GARDINER Sophia A. | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 59 | CHEN Jasmine | 100% | 65% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 60 | CHEN Yichun | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 61 | FERRIS Nayah | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 62 | FURST Chloe | 100% | 99% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
| 63 | GUZIK Stella | 100% | 94% | 63% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 64 | SILVER Anna | 100% | 59% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 65 | JONES Jenna | 100% | 66% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | SIEB Sydney | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.