Madison, NJ - Madison, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
| 2 | XUE Alanna | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 40% | 15% | |
| 3 | HUANG Natalie | - | 4% | 18% | 39% | 33% | 5% | |
| 3 | ACHILOVA Feyza | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 39% | 14% |
| 5 | SOLSKY Brooke A. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 6 | MCSHINE Katelyn H. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 7 | MILLER Naomi E. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% |
| 8 | WANG Ellen | - | - | - | 5% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
| 9 | HECKMANN Emma | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 10 | FU Qihan | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 43% | 20% | |
| 11 | LI Rachel Y. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 12 | WU Julianna Y. | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 13 | SEGAL Lydia G. | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 14 | SHAW Kayla M. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 46% | |
| 15 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | - | 2% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 16 | NARANG Maya | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 17 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | - | 2% | 19% | 43% | 30% | 6% | |
| 18 | MOY Kayla A. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 35% | 7% |
| 19 | HOLLE Aviella S. | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 42% | 13% | |
| 20 | WEINTRAUB Io H. | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 21 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 9% |
| 22 | PAGES Melanie | - | 5% | 20% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 23 | CHEN Georgia M. | 9% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | < 1% | - |
| 24 | VEERKAMP Molly | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 26% | |
| 25 | SLASKI Caroline O. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 26 | SU Michelle | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 26% | |
| 27 | YU Jaime L. | - | 5% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 6% | |
| 28 | BOODELL Ella | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
| 29 | BASSON Bayley D. | 1% | 9% | 33% | 40% | 16% | 2% | |
| 30 | TANG Ai Jia | 2% | 14% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 31 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 32 | JENKINS Hannah G. | 1% | 7% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 33 | BHAN Zala | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 34 | BECKER Elena | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% |
| 35 | BECCHINA Claire E. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 36 | MUELLER Tatum J. | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 37 | WERBACH Esther | 3% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 38 | KANIUK Rachel | 1% | 12% | 37% | 36% | 12% | 1% | |
| 39 | LIU Sophia | 3% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
| 40 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 41 | LAM Victoria M. | 5% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 6% | - | |
| 42 | DRANOVSKY Dasha | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% |
| 43 | HEISER Anna M. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 44 | GINDE Maithili | 11% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 45 | JULIUS Sonia | 4% | 35% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 46 | GUTKOVSKAYA Nora | - | - | < 1% | 6% | 31% | 63% | |
| 47 | DRESSEL Pamela (Pam) A. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% |
| 48 | HUNT Abigail S. | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 49 | ROHRING Anna L. | 51% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 50 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 65% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 51 | LAPPER Whitney P. | 79% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 52 | CHARALEL Jessica | 8% | 43% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 53 | SCHLOTTERBECK Abigail | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 54 | ZGOMBIC Emily | 14% | 39% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | CHEUNG Kaitlin | 32% | 49% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 56 | NICOU Melina | 7% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 57 | MUTAKABBIR Assata | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 58 | GARDINER Sophia A. | 26% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 59 | CHEN Jasmine | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 60 | CHEN Yichun | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 61 | FERRIS Nayah | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 62 | FURST Chloe | 1% | 22% | 42% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
| 63 | GUZIK Stella | 6% | 31% | 45% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 64 | SILVER Anna | 41% | 48% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 65 | JONES Jenna | 34% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 66 | SIEB Sydney | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.