Madison, NJ - Madison, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | KOO Haley B. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
| 2 | FERRARI Christina M. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 3 | JING Emily | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 3 | SHEN Sophia H. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 5 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 6 | MOLHO Sofia | V V V V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 7 | LEVI Lea | D V V V D | V V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 8 | KOO Rachel A. | D D V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 9 | SHEN Jasmine N. | V V D V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 10 | LEE Bethany W. | V V V V D | V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 11 | XU Madison | V V D V V | V V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 12 | SADAN Jordan E. | V V V V D | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 13 | YU Jaime L. | D V V V | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 14 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | V V V D D | V V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 15 | RASO Sofia G. | V D D D | V V D | 3.3 | 1 | -2.3 |
| 16 | SERBAN Samantha M. | V D D D D | V V D | 3.7 | 1 | -2.7 |
| 17 | HOOSHI Erica S. | V V V V V | D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 18 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | D V V V V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 19 | ZHENG Ivy | V D V V V | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 20 | YE Eileen | V V V D V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 21 | PEVZNER Victoria | V D V V V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 22 | CHEN Kelly | D V V V D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 23 | HECKMANN Emma | V D D V V V | V | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 24 | LOW Sharon J. | V V D V V D | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 25 | WU Irene M. | D D V D V V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 26 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | V V D V D D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 27 | DU Hannah | D D V D V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 28 | PO Edith | D V D V D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 29 | MUELLER Tatum J. | D D D V D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 30 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | D D V D | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 31 | LI Meilin | D V D D D | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 32 | WERBACH Esther | D D D D V | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 33 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | D V V D V V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 34 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | V D V V D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 35 | WU Julianna Y. | D D V V V | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 36 | RENTON Samantha | V V D V D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 37 | PAVE Claire | D V V D V | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 38 | ACHILOVA Feyza | D D V D V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 39 | SU Michelle | V D D D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 40 | HEISER Anna M. | D D D V V | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 41 | HUNT Abigail S. | V D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 42 | BHAN Zala | V D D D V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 43 | LOGAN Jade | V D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 44 | ZHANG Alina C. | V D D D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 44 | TANG Ai Jia | V D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 46 | NICOU Melina | D V D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 47 | MCPHERSON Hannah C. | D V D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 48 | BASSON Bayley D. | D D V D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 49 | GINDE Maithili | D V D D D D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 | |
| 50 | JONES Jenna | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 51 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 52 | DAUM Sydney | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 53 | SIEB Sydney | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 53 | ABREU Ashley | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 55 | DOWNER Emma-Li | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.