Madison, NJ - Madison, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KOO Haley B. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 71% |
| 2 | FERRARI Christina M. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 67% |
| 3 | JING Emily | - | - | 2% | 17% | 53% | 28% | |
| 3 | SHEN Sophia H. | - | - | 5% | 26% | 46% | 23% | |
| 5 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | - | - | 4% | 23% | 45% | 28% | |
| 6 | MOLHO Sofia | - | 2% | 18% | 51% | 28% | ||
| 7 | LEVI Lea | - | - | 3% | 22% | 50% | 24% | |
| 8 | KOO Rachel A. | - | - | - | 8% | 43% | 48% | |
| 9 | SHEN Jasmine N. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 22% | |
| 10 | LEE Bethany W. | 1% | 12% | 34% | 39% | 13% | 1% | |
| 11 | XU Madison | 1% | 16% | 40% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
| 12 | SADAN Jordan E. | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 46% | 20% | |
| 13 | YU Jaime L. | 7% | 33% | 44% | 15% | 1% | ||
| 14 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | 1% | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
| 15 | RASO Sofia G. | - | 1% | 11% | 45% | 43% | ||
| 16 | SERBAN Samantha M. | - | < 1% | 7% | 30% | 44% | 19% | |
| 17 | HOOSHI Erica S. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% | |
| 18 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 42% | 16% | |
| 19 | ZHENG Ivy | - | - | 2% | 14% | 44% | 41% | |
| 20 | YE Eileen | - | 2% | 17% | 41% | 32% | 8% | |
| 21 | PEVZNER Victoria | - | - | 1% | 12% | 43% | 43% | |
| 22 | CHEN Kelly | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 3% |
| 23 | HECKMANN Emma | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 2% |
| 24 | LOW Sharon J. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% |
| 25 | WU Irene M. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 1% |
| 26 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | - |
| 27 | DU Hannah | 6% | 36% | 40% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 28 | PO Edith | - | 14% | 43% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
| 29 | MUELLER Tatum J. | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 30 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | 28% | 48% | 21% | 3% | - | ||
| 31 | LI Meilin | 1% | 12% | 37% | 37% | 12% | 1% | |
| 32 | WERBACH Esther | 28% | 44% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 33 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 34 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | - | 2% | 19% | 43% | 29% | 6% | |
| 35 | WU Julianna Y. | 3% | 49% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | RENTON Samantha | - | 5% | 29% | 49% | 15% | 1% | |
| 37 | PAVE Claire | 4% | 40% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | ACHILOVA Feyza | 1% | 12% | 44% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
| 39 | SU Michelle | 7% | 30% | 41% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 40 | HEISER Anna M. | 29% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 41 | HUNT Abigail S. | 12% | 42% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | BHAN Zala | 10% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 43 | LOGAN Jade | 29% | 47% | 21% | 3% | - | ||
| 44 | ZHANG Alina C. | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
| 44 | TANG Ai Jia | 2% | 29% | 48% | 19% | 2% | - | |
| 46 | NICOU Melina | 42% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 47 | MCPHERSON Hannah C. | 16% | 41% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | BASSON Bayley D. | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 49 | GINDE Maithili | 37% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 50 | JONES Jenna | 66% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 51 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 89% | 10% | - | - | - | - | |
| 52 | DAUM Sydney | 27% | 44% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
| 53 | SIEB Sydney | 83% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 53 | ABREU Ashley | 25% | 49% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
| 55 | DOWNER Emma-Li | 23% | 40% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.