Ontario Convention Center - Hall A & B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 22% |
| 2 | KRYLTSOV Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 25% |
| 3 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% | |
| 3 | NGUYEN Martin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 15% | |
| 5 | YI William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 14% | |
| 6 | LEUNG Chu Ming Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% | |
| 7 | MEJIA MATTHEW D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 43% | |
| 8 | CORTRIGHT Skipper | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% |
| 9 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
| 10 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% | |
| 11 | LIPPMAN Sam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 16% | |
| 12 | LLIDO Soren | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 18% | |
| 13 | HUANG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 10% |
| 14 | SHAGIDANYAN German | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 47% | ||
| 15 | WU Alber Y. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 11% | |
| 16 | EDISON Ansel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 31% | 5% | |
| 17 | LIU Jinning | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 42% |
| 18 | LIU Zixian (Aaron) | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 6% | |
| 19 | LI Jett | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 3% |
| 20 | PARK Rion | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 21 | LI Matthew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 19% | |
| 22 | CHOI Ethan | 100% | 96% | 68% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 23 | TUAN Evan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 51% | 10% | ||
| 24 | PARK Sky | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 2% |
| 25 | WONG Yuheng Isaac | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 26 | PARK Steve (Sangmin) | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 27 | ZHANG Jacob | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 28 | KIM Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 7% | |
| 29 | PINCHENG Yao | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 17% | 2% | |
| 30 | WONG Evan | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 31 | TSAY Jordan R. | 100% | 99% | 78% | 34% | 7% | 1% | |
| 32 | LYNCH Owen C. | 100% | 96% | 72% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 33 | REICHEL Ezra | 100% | 97% | 79% | 38% | 8% | 1% | |
| 34 | SCHIENEMAN Valentine | 100% | 96% | 69% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 35 | ZHONG Maxwell | 100% | 92% | 56% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 36 | BAE Eugene | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 37 | GORDON William L. | 100% | 93% | 63% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 38 | LING Carson Jr | 100% | 84% | 32% | 5% | - | ||
| 39 | PETROV Mikhail | 100% | 40% | 6% | - | - | ||
| 40 | LI Toby | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 52% | 13% | |
| 41 | LIU William | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 16% | 2% | |
| 42 | SAH Steven | 100% | 98% | 65% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 43 | PARK William | 100% | 92% | 54% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 44 | PONS Diego | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 11% | 1% |
| 45 | KIM Brian | 100% | 99% | 89% | 50% | 10% | ||
| 46 | PARK David | 100% | 87% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | BORG Matthew | 100% | 92% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 48 | YANG Charles | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 49 | ZHANG Graham | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | GREENEBAUM Oliver | 100% | 78% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | MONTGOMERY Georgie | 100% | 41% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 51 | DAYAL Vedant | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 53 | JIANG Yehong | 100% | 56% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 54 | KUO Jayden | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 55 | SMITH Jeremiah | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 56 | YUAN Jonathan | 100% | 12% | - | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.