Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 33% | |
| 2 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 39% | 10% |
| 3 | SHEN Lydia | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 55% |
| 3 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | - | - | 1% | 14% | 46% | 38% | |
| 5 | YU Lauren C. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 26% |
| 6 | HO Brianna W. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% |
| 7 | LEE Lavender | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% |
| 8 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 66% |
| 9 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% |
| 10 | MILLER Naomi E. | - | - | 3% | 22% | 49% | 25% | |
| 11 | MI Aileen | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% |
| 12 | SHIM Grace J. | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 13 | CHO Emily (Euran) | - | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 14 | MEI Sarah | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 9% |
| 15 | NEWHARD Zelia "Zizi" | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 45% | 21% | |
| 16 | HAO Danica | 18% | 44% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 17 | SHEN Emilia | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 18 | SHENG Chuxi | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
| 19 | YAO Ada | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
| 20 | FENG Grace | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 21 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 1% | 8% | 30% | 40% | 19% | 3% | |
| 22 | LIN Zhi tong | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 4% |
| 23 | CALISE Ella | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 2% |
| 24 | YANG Emma | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 25 | WU Julianna Y. | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% |
| 26 | CHEN Renee | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 27 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | 1% | 11% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 28 | SHA Yi Ling | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 29 | PEVZNER Nicole | 5% | 29% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 30 | ZELDIN Nadia | 12% | 47% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | MARKOVSKY Nina | - | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 32 | MI Anning | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
| 33 | MCSHERRY Ava | - | 2% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 34 | WANG Jasmine | 1% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 35 | SEO IRENE Y. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 16% |
| 36 | SHMAY Anastasia | 2% | 17% | 40% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
| 37 | PAULUS Isabella | 19% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | WANG Chloe | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 39 | LI Han (Helina) | 26% | 40% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | ZHENG Julie | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
| 41 | LIU Long | 27% | 48% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 42 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
| 43 | LI Eleanor | - | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 44 | ROY Layla | - | 4% | 24% | 46% | 23% | 3% | |
| 45 | LEVY Avery | 13% | 44% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | CHOW Annabelle | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 3% |
| 47 | GU Emily | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 47 | RICHARD Dominique | 2% | 20% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 49 | PAULUS Sloane E. | - | 8% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 50 | WANG Sabrina | 8% | 37% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | BHAN Zala | 1% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 52 | WANG Yudi | 40% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 53 | LI Xiang (Shining) | 83% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 54 | CHAKRAPANI Ila | 59% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 55 | RICHARD Clara | 3% | 36% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 56 | SHAH Suhani | 49% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 57 | CHEN Jasmine | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 58 | WANG Reese | 38% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 59 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 60 | BIENSTOCK Alexis | 62% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 60 | CHEN Sophie | 77% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.