Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHAMBERS Miles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% |
2 | DOMINIQUE Remson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% | |
3 | ONG Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 15% |
3 | KIM Daehwan(Benjamin) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 13% | |
5 | WELSTEAD Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 21% |
6 | SALDARINI Glenn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% | |
7 | SASSI Ilyas | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% | |
8 | KHANNA Adamantis | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% | |
9 | SHAPIRO Simon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% | |
10 | VIDREVICH David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% |
11 | LAMTAN Christoffer | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 26% | 3% | |
12 | WANG tiger | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 4% | |
13 | STEVENS Flynn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
14 | TAYCHER Aaron | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 30% | 4% | |
15 | LEE Damian | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | |
16 | PEACE Samuel | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 19% | 2% | |
17 | HAIRABEDIAN Ellis | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
18 | CHANG Timothy | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 38% | 6% | |
19 | HOWARTH Hayes | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
20 | SONG Aidan | 100% | 97% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
21 | CHAVAN Aditya | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 10% | - |
22 | CRAWFORD William | 100% | 94% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - | |
23 | MARSHQUIST Miles | 100% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
24 | FOSTER Trevor | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
25 | MHLEY Gavin | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
26 | KOREN George | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
27 | LAU Kyrus | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
28 | MIAO Heqi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% | |
29 | SHINCHUK Jacob | 100% | 90% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | |
30 | LIU Eric | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 22% | 3% | |
31 | SINGH Sumair | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 13% | |
32 | CAREY Sam | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
33 | LEVIN Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 11% |
34 | RODRIGUEZ GALVAN Andres | 100% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
35 | ARVIND Adhijay | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 4% | |
36 | CUSSON William | 100% | 93% | 62% | 17% | 2% | - | |
37 | MALEK Zak | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% | |
38 | GRIGORYAN Sevak | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 17% | 2% | |
39 | CAI Lin Rui | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 49% | 6% | |
40 | SAUVE Quinn | 100% | 86% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
41 | EARLEY Jack | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
42 | RABEL Alexander | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 7% | - |
43 | LEIGH Brayden | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 8% | - |
44 | RABEL Sebastian | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | |
45 | MENZIES Liam | 100% | 76% | 29% | 4% | - | - | |
46 | BURENKOV Matthew | 100% | 73% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
47 | SHALISH Milan | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | |
48 | CHAN Ewan | 100% | 79% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
48 | GAYTAN Antonio | 100% | 72% | 27% | 4% | - | - | |
50 | WANG William | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
51 | HORJUS Daniel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
52 | DANIELS William | 100% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
53 | KARAVAS Nicholas | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | |
54 | DATTILIO Aidan | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
55 | HILL Robbie | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - |
56 | KOREN David | 100% | 71% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
57 | O’LOUGHLIN Jacob | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.