UWM Sports Complex - Pontiac, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 44% | 38% |
2 | SENIC Lucas | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 46% |
3 | NICOLETTI Luca | - | - | - | - | 4% | 33% | 63% |
3 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 21% | |
5 | ALLEN Henry G. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% |
6 | GUTH Joseph | - | - | 4% | 19% | 44% | 33% | |
7 | SUAREZ Adrian | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 26% |
8 | LIU Jinning | - | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 67% |
9 | ZHANG Lucas | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% | |
10 | TANG Alexander L. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 38% | 7% |
11 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
12 | GHEDINI Luca | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 22% |
13 | VANOYEN Dominick | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
14 | STRINGER David | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 19% |
15 | LI Richard | - | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
16 | CHOI Benjamin | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 40% | 17% | 2% |
17 | XU Xinhao ( Sonny) | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 29% |
18 | LIU Ethan | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
19 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | - | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 45% | 15% |
20 | EDWARDS Maxon | - | - | 2% | 19% | 48% | 31% | |
21 | PARRISH Evan | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 27% | |
22 | LORENZO Alejandro | - | - | - | 4% | 25% | 54% | 17% |
23 | TSAY Jordan R. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% |
24 | DIEPSTRA Jeremy | - | 2% | 16% | 48% | 29% | 5% | |
25 | MASSIMINO Andrew | 2% | 16% | 38% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
26 | BERNARD Cohen | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
27 | SLUSHER Gideon | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
28 | VOLLMER Quintin | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
29 | RAJ Jay | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 41% | 17% | |
30 | HUANG Chenghan | 2% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
31 | CHO Xzander | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 3% |
32 | XU Ethan | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
33 | CHUANG Oscar | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% | |
34 | LU Jingyi | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% |
35 | GOODLIN Sean | - | 11% | 35% | 38% | 14% | 1% | - |
36 | ZHENG Marcus | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
37 | SUAREZ David | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
38 | FEDELI Francesco | - | - | 2% | 18% | 48% | 32% | |
39 | KUE Temujin | 1% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
40 | HICKEY Connor | 12% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
41 | DESERANNO Leander | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
42 | XIE Buster | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
43 | LU Alex | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 6% | - |
44 | KNIBBE Nathan | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
45 | LAMBERT Parker | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
46 | KIM Daniel | 1% | 9% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 3% | |
47 | FINDLAY Zachary | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
48 | WENGER Liam | 5% | 29% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - | |
49 | BAI Brian | - | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
49 | ZMUDA Aiden | 1% | 17% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - |
51 | MARISI Gabriel | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
52 | LATORRE Leonardo | 18% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
53 | MODADUGU Aryan | 38% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
54 | WANG Xiuqi(Arthur) | 5% | 29% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
55 | WU Thomas | 6% | 36% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
56 | OZAWA Taishi | 9% | 33% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
57 | HERRERA Xavier | 43% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
58 | MAVANI Krishna | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - | |
59 | DHOKTE Neev | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | - |
60 | ELKOUSY Zain al Din | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
61 | JAZWINSKI Ryan | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
62 | FRASER Rhys | 19% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
63 | LEE Ian | 1% | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
64 | FANG Haoyu | 1% | 12% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
65 | GUO Joey | 10% | 40% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
66 | BAI Austin | 12% | 39% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | |
67 | NAZARIO Dominic | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
68 | WANG Daniel | 3% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
69 | WEI Winston | 42% | 44% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
70 | LIU Yinhong | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
71 | TATE Liam | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
71 | MCGRATH Milo | 2% | 25% | 42% | 25% | 6% | - | - |
73 | GOGOI Kavi | 18% | 46% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
74 | LATTA Zamir | 22% | 50% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
75 | JOYCE Ryan | 52% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
76 | NG Gavin | 54% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
77 | SONG Yuxuan Austin | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
78 | GARRARD Jeremiah | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
78 | NOTHIAS Sebastien | 77% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
80 | CHAN William | 77% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.