UWM Sports Complex - Pontiac, MI, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 38% |
| 2 | SENIC Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 46% |
| 3 | NICOLETTI Luca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 63% |
| 3 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% | |
| 5 | ALLEN Henry G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% |
| 6 | GUTH Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% | |
| 7 | SUAREZ Adrian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 26% |
| 8 | LIU Jinning | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% |
| 9 | ZHANG Lucas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% | |
| 10 | TANG Alexander L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 7% |
| 11 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 12 | GHEDINI Luca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% |
| 13 | VANOYEN Dominick | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 14 | STRINGER David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 19% |
| 15 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 16 | CHOI Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 19% | 2% |
| 17 | XU Xinhao ( Sonny) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% |
| 18 | LIU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
| 19 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 15% |
| 20 | EDWARDS Maxon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 31% | |
| 21 | PARRISH Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 27% | |
| 22 | LORENZO Alejandro | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 17% |
| 23 | TSAY Jordan R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 3% |
| 24 | DIEPSTRA Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 34% | 5% | |
| 25 | MASSIMINO Andrew | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 11% | 1% | |
| 26 | BERNARD Cohen | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 27 | SLUSHER Gideon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 3% |
| 28 | VOLLMER Quintin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
| 29 | RAJ Jay | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 17% | |
| 30 | HUANG Chenghan | 100% | 98% | 76% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 31 | CHO Xzander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 25% | 3% |
| 32 | XU Ethan | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
| 33 | CHUANG Oscar | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% | |
| 34 | LU Jingyi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% |
| 35 | GOODLIN Sean | 100% | 100% | 89% | 54% | 16% | 1% | - |
| 36 | ZHENG Marcus | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 37 | SUAREZ David | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 38 | FEDELI Francesco | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 32% | |
| 39 | KUE Temujin | 100% | 99% | 85% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
| 40 | HICKEY Connor | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 41 | DESERANNO Leander | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 42 | XIE Buster | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 7% |
| 43 | LU Alex | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 7% | - |
| 44 | KNIBBE Nathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 11% | 1% |
| 45 | LAMBERT Parker | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 44% | 9% | 1% |
| 46 | KIM Daniel | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 21% | 3% | |
| 47 | FINDLAY Zachary | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% | |
| 48 | WENGER Liam | 100% | 95% | 66% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 49 | BAI Brian | 100% | 100% | 92% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 49 | ZMUDA Aiden | 100% | 99% | 82% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 51 | MARISI Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 52 | LATORRE Leonardo | 100% | 82% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | MODADUGU Aryan | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 54 | WANG Xiuqi(Arthur) | 100% | 95% | 66% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
| 55 | WU Thomas | 100% | 94% | 59% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 56 | OZAWA Taishi | 100% | 91% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 57 | HERRERA Xavier | 100% | 57% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 58 | MAVANI Krishna | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 59 | DHOKTE Neev | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 60 | ELKOUSY Zain al Din | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 61 | JAZWINSKI Ryan | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 62 | FRASER Rhys | 100% | 81% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | LEE Ian | 100% | 99% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 64 | FANG Haoyu | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 65 | GUO Joey | 100% | 90% | 50% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | BAI Austin | 100% | 88% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 67 | NAZARIO Dominic | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 68 | WANG Daniel | 100% | 97% | 75% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
| 69 | WEI Winston | 100% | 58% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 70 | LIU Yinhong | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 71 | TATE Liam | 100% | 80% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 71 | MCGRATH Milo | 100% | 98% | 73% | 31% | 6% | - | - |
| 73 | GOGOI Kavi | 100% | 82% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 74 | LATTA Zamir | 100% | 78% | 28% | 4% | - | - | |
| 75 | JOYCE Ryan | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 76 | NG Gavin | 100% | 46% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 77 | SONG Yuxuan Austin | 100% | 56% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 78 | GARRARD Jeremiah | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 78 | NOTHIAS Sebastien | 100% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 80 | CHAN William | 100% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.