UWM Sports Complex - Pontiac, MI, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM ELIJAH | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 38% | |
| 2 | MEHAN Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% |
| 3 | BERA Enzo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 41% | ||
| 3 | CHUNG Connor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% |
| 5 | BONETTI Brayden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 31% | 4% |
| 6 | SIDDIQUI Shayan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% |
| 7 | WITCZAK Mateus | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 8 | GERSTMANN Max T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 11% | |
| 9 | CHAMBERS Miles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 29% |
| 10 | ALAVE Kyle | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 16% | |
| 11 | LIN Philip T. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 9% | |
| 12 | PINTO Marcus | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 32% | 5% | |
| 13 | HENDERSON Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 16% | 2% |
| 14 | ANDRES Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 26% |
| 15 | WANG Max | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 16 | KANIA Alexander | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 17 | KATZ Ryan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 26% | ||
| 18 | SRIVATS Vedh | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 9% | |
| 19 | SONG Aidan | 100% | 99% | 83% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 20 | HUA Michael | 100% | 97% | 67% | 20% | 2% | ||
| 21 | WANG Max | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 22 | CAO Ray | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 11% | 1% |
| 23 | SUN Andrew | 100% | 96% | 75% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
| 24 | CHEN Lucas | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 19% | 3% | |
| 25 | YOOK Isaac | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 17% | 2% |
| 26 | WANG Yitong Tom | 100% | 56% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 27 | PARKILA Lukas | 100% | 93% | 52% | 11% | 1% | ||
| 28 | TURNER Benjamin | 100% | 79% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | HIBINO Uta | 100% | 96% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 30 | WELLER Noah | 100% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
| 31 | NAFTALI Ori | 100% | 97% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 32 | AO Christopher | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 33 | CHANG Timothy | 100% | 94% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 34 | RAVOOR Suvir | 100% | 61% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 35 | HOLLINGER Caden | 100% | 29% | 3% | - | - | ||
| 36 | STOIA Jack | 100% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 37 | RAVOOR Sahas | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 38 | DU Shengrui | 100% | 85% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.