Thousand Oaks, CA - Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | YEU Irene | - | - | - | - | 1% | 15% | 84% |
2 | LEUNG Natalie | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% | |
3 | MORGAN Lexiss M. | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 12% | |
3 | BEI Karen | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 21% |
5 | ZHOU Emily | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
6 | JIN Jasmine | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
7 | ERTAS Eileen | - | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
8 | MYERS Helen Sophia A. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
9 | MYERS Jeanelle Christina A. | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
10 | OPERARIO Abigail Z. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | |
11 | LAVERY Chloe K. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
12 | JIANG Corina | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
13 | DINGMAN Amanda | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
14 | QURESHI Aafreen | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
15 | DANIEL Olivia | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 2% | |
16 | SOIN Anika A. | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 8% | 1% | |
17 | BRYANT Michelle | 14% | 47% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
18 | DARANOUVONG Logan | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 5% | - |
19 | DU Angela | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% | - |
20 | JIANG Claire | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
21 | WILLIAMS Sarah | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
22 | OGANESIAN Alice N. | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
23 | MAHAL Riya | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - | |
24 | SINHA Zara | 16% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
25 | LI Vivian | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
26 | MAHAL Anya | 52% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.