2nd Annual BBFC RYC and Y8

Youth 14 Men’s Saber (Y14MS)

Sunday, December 14, 2025 at 3:00 PM

Register

Tarkanian Basketball Center - Las Vegas, NV

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1953 2249 - 1770
5 - 8 1731 1800 - 1651
9 - 16 1480 1787 - 1223
17 - 24 1029 1184 - 673

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Hwang, Hagan LA Fencing Academy of Pomona D24 2249 1997.70
2 ZHANG, KAIQI West Coast Fencing Academy E25 1962 1704.34
3 Fischer, Noel Las Vegas Fencing Academy U 1830 1544.14
4 Desai, Arthav Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 1770 1505.85
5 Kim, Suin West Coast Fencing Academy E25 1800 1498.69
6 Wang, David Avant Garde Fencers Club, Inc (CA) (AGFC) U 1759 1481.88
7 Luo, Gavin The Fencing Center U 1714 1453.39
8 Chan, Troy Rebel Fencing Club E25 1651 1362.48
9 Moroaica, Seiku Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 1787 1344.30
10 Chen, Aaron LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 1561 1289.17
11 Han, Kyle South Bay Fencing Academy E25 1556 1284.08
12 An, Chris (Siyoung) Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 1601 1115.69
13 Wang, Xuren Avant Garde Fencers Club, Inc (CA) (AGFC) U 1551 1089.24
14 Sloan, Ethan Spartak U 1223 884.65
15 Kim, Leo Rebel Fencing Club U 1286 868.68
16 Yang, Jake LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 1279 800.02
17 Kim, Derek South Bay Fencing Academy U 1131 660.01
18 Adams, Jordan Rebel Fencing Club U 1134 602.25
19 Lei, Isaac LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 960 600.14
20 Wu, Dustin Yilin LA International Fencing U 1184 517.65
21 Lovell, Jackson Spartak U 903 488.52
22 Rohrbach, Flynn Fencing Academy Of Denver U 1135 374.00
23 Hirota, Jackson Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 1110 362.59
24 Hirota, Mitchell Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 673 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!