Challenge by the Bay RYC/RCC/Y8

Cadet Men’s Saber (CDTMS)

Friday, April 3, 2026 at 11:30 AM

Register

Power Sports Academy - Martinez, CA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2179 2377 - 1997
5 - 8 1861 2055 - 1772
9 - 16 1623 1967 - 1414
17 - 27 1221 2046 - 833

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Grigoriev, Roman Premier Fencing Academy D25 2377 2117.04
2 Kang, Jeremy Premier Fencing Academy C25 2330 2074.24
3 Tang, Morgan Halberstadt Fencers' Club E25 2013 1757.51
4 Bekdjanov, Arthur Premier Fencing Academy E25 1997 1722.14
5 Bagga, Shray Premier Fencing Academy E25 2055 1588.12
6 Wang, David Avant Garde Fencers Club, Inc (CA) (AGFC) U 1843 1577.67
7 Luo, Gavin ORO Fencing Club D25 1775 1519.31
8 Fischer, Noel Fence MI Fencing Academy U 1772 1502.99
9 Masaki, Alex Premier Fencing Academy E25 1883 1450.81
10 Robuchon, Aleksandr United Fencers of Oakland E25 1967 1346.37
11 Chen, Zhengming Eagle Blade Fencers Club E25 1717 1331.45
12 Gottschalk, Theodore United Fencers of Oakland E25 1597 1221.28
13 Cao, Chong ORO Fencing Club U 1503 1163.85
14 Kim, Leo Rebel Fencing Club U 1489 1158.32
15 Venkatraman, Sushil The Fencing Center E25 1415 1123.12
16 Rambhia, Smit Premier Fencing Academy U 1414 1081.80
17 Perera, Sebastian Premier Fencing Academy U 2046 1058.16
18 Westmoreland-Brown, Cole Sacramento Saber Fencing LLC U 1414 1017.85
19 Orlino, Samuel Premier Fencing Academy U 1401 893.28
20 Chang, William Sacramento Saber Fencing LLC U 1238 606.73
21 Nazif, Alexander Spartak U 893 228.04
22 Wu, Garrick Premier Fencing Academy U 897 183.09
23 Chew, Marcus Cardinal Fencing Club U 1059 < 0
24 Hamdan, Zachery Cardinal Fencing Club U 833 < 0
25 Loh-Ratan, Atticus Cardinal Fencing Club U 1747 < 0
26 Pei, Kennedy U 853 < 0
27 Xie, Jingwei Sacramento Saber Fencing LLC U 1052 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!