Midwest SYC/RCC

Youth 12 Men’s Foil (Y12MF)

Saturday, January 31, 2026 at 8:00 AM

Register

Canlan Sports Libertyville - Libertyville, IL

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2311 2402 - 2178
5 - 8 1801 1958 - 1704
9 - 16 1516 1704 - 1328
17 - 25 1237 1745 - 888

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 LIM, EUNSEONG Auburn Fencing Club C25 2402 2138.05
2 Wu, Wallace Fencers Club Inc. E25 2392 2121.87
3 TAN, Charlie Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy D25 2272 2012.96
4 Lyu, Brandon Golubitsky Fencing Center D25 2178 1916.10
5 Rau, Shogun Silicon Valley Fencing Center D25 1958 1704.76
6 McCool, Henry Renaissance Fencing Club U 1783 1488.63
7 Zhang, William Team Touche Fencing Center U 1759 1487.85
8 Xu, Jason Renaissance Fencing Club U 1704 1420.01
9 Yoon, Mason Fencers Club Inc. U 1640 1344.02
10 Sharma, Ari Top Fencing Club U 1590 1324.02
11 Sun, Lucas Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1585 1319.79
12 Kanan, Noland Renaissance Fencing Club U 1704 1294.33
13 Kajita, Grayson Massialas Foundation (M Team) U 1436 1163.36
14 Sha, Laien SoCAL Fencing Center U 1444 1119.76
15 Jue, Lucas Massialas Foundation (M Team) U 1397 1090.62
16 Li, Mason Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1328 1059.93
17 Meng, Andy Golubitsky Fencing Center U 1247 956.27
18 Yuan, Vincent Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1234 664.23
19 Chen, Andrew Queen City Fencers Club LLC U 1390 611.80
20 Lin, Alex Space City Fencing Academy U 1026 535.88
21 Kress, Elias Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy U 1169 518.21
22 Chang, Joshua Fencing Institute Of Texas U 888 467.32
23 Kline, Benjamin Columbus International Fencing Academy U 1106 316.54
24 Rees, Vaughan RedStar Fencing Club Chicago U 1325 64.88
25 Stephan, Tyler Fencing Center Of Chicago U 1745 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!