AFM Sunnyvale - Sunnyvale, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CLAES Thomas | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
2 | KOFMAN David | 1% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | |
3 | BUENAVENTURA Camden | - | 4% | 16% | 30% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
3 | ROBINSON Samuel | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% |
5 | MANA Arnav | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
6 | WANG Devin | - | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 34% | 10% |
7 | WU Steven | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% | |
8 | LEUNG Dylan | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% | |
9 | LIU Max | 7% | 32% | 40% | 18% | 3% | ||
10 | XIE Andrew | 12% | 37% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | < 1% |
11 | MA Ryan | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 7% |
12 | TUBALTSEV Evan | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 34% | ||
13 | SU Samuel | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 21% | 2% |
14 | LOUIE Joseph | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
15 | CHANG Ray | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% | |
16 | WONG Vansen | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
17 | JAO Aaron | - | 5% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 5% | |
18 | DING Max | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 37% | 13% | |
19 | GORDON David | - | 4% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
20 | GUO Luke | 6% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
21 | KHUSHRAJ Rohan | 5% | 28% | 41% | 22% | 4% | ||
22 | MANA Sameer | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 33% | 30% | 11% |
23 | SRIKANTH Hariharan | 3% | 14% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 4% | - |
24 | LYSENKO Timofei | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
25 | LIU Xuyao | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
26 | AKHMEDIANOV Timur | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
27 | WONG Aaron | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
28 | ZHANG Luqi | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
29 | MILLIKAN Aaron | 1% | 13% | 36% | 38% | 12% | ||
30 | LUO Alvin (Yueyang) Y. | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | |
32 | LIN Daniel | 7% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
33 | STREAM Logan | 5% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
34 | ZHU Owen | 7% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - | |
35 | HUA Nolan | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
36 | CHUNG Sawyer | 8% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
37 | ZHANG William | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
38 | GUPTA Hemansh | 42% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | ||
39 | YU Brandon | 49% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
40 | YU Haoyun Timothy | 10% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - | |
41 | XIE Elon | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
42 | DESHPANDE Arihant | - | 16% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - |
43 | SONG Joshua | 2% | 10% | 25% | 32% | 22% | 8% | 1% |
44 | NARAYANUN Advay | 34% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
45 | TALATAM Arnav | 1% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
46 | SISODIA Shauryaditya | 1% | 29% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.