Midwest RYC/RJCC

Youth 14 Men’s Foil (Y14MF)

Sunday, April 5, 2026 at 9:30 AM

Register

Canlan Sports Lake Barrington - BARRINGTON, IL

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1940 2325 - 1639
5 - 8 1580 1644 - 1521
9 - 16 1358 1539 - 1099
17 - 26 975 1807 - 690

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 DeSeranno, Leander Renaissance Fencing Club C24 2325 2068.69
2 Zhou, Justin The Fencers Academy D25 1981 1661.55
3 McCool, Henry Renaissance Fencing Club U 1813 1537.17
4 Fostervold, Castiel Twin Cities Fencing Club D25 1639 1351.95
5 Chen, Kyler U 1644 1311.00
6 Webster, Liam The Fencers Academy D25 1625 1299.72
7 Morales, Tycho RedStar Fencing Club Chicago U 1521 1241.40
8 Coran, Roland Renaissance Fencing Club U 1532 1171.13
9 Williams, Thomas Grand Rapids Fencing Academy U 1449 1132.22
10 Chen, Kyle Heartland Fencing Academy U 1539 1086.52
11 Chen, Evan Heartland Fencing Academy U 1444 1001.93
12 Kline, Benjamin Columbus International Fencing Academy U 1365 884.86
13 Xu, Rambert The Fencers Academy E26 1172 785.47
14 Park, Nathan Heartland Fencing Academy U 1265 731.63
15 Crossett, Peter Iowa City Fencing Center E25 1529 603.99
16 An, Jacob Eminence Fencing Academy U 1099 596.91
17 Hardwick, Alex Cleveland Fencing Academy East LLC E25 1139 593.72
18 Marvel, Elliot Grand Rapids Fencing Academy U 941 409.47
19 Matiyash, Andrew Eminence Fencing Academy U 929 395.09
20 Durai, Dheeraj Ohio Fencing Center U 948 304.70
21 Yang, Haopeng Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club U 1807 < 0
22 Stamps, Jasper RedStar Fencing Club Chicago U 847 < 0
23 Stephan, Tyler RedStar Fencing Club Chicago U 880 < 0
24 Valeri, Ryan Eminence Fencing Academy U 690 < 0
25 Jain, Kavya Queen City Fencers Club LLC U 837 < 0
26 Nowicki, William Fencing Center Of Chicago U 729 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!