San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZILINSKIY Eduard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% | |
| 2 | SHAMIS Mark | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 7% |
| 3 | SUVOROV Yuly | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
| 3 | LEI Joshua | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 36% | |
| 5 | JOHNSON Lucas W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 33% | 6% |
| 6 | WISOFF Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 5% |
| 7 | THORNE Casey B. | 100% | 100% | 87% | 51% | 15% | 1% | |
| 8 | DESOUZA Hansel S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 7% | |
| 9 | NG Alexander M. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
| 10 | YULE Alexander L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 73% | 31% |
| 11 | KIM PAUL | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 26% | |
| 12 | MACHULSKY Ned | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 17% | |
| 13 | SHUR Yakov C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 7% | |
| 14 | ANDERSON Elias W. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% | |
| 15 | DORRELL Connor I. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 8% |
| 16 | SCHINDLER Sergey M. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 5% | |
| 17 | STOLZ Robert | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 7% | |
| 18 | DESSAUER Tobyn M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 9% | |
| 19 | LIANG Aaron | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 17% | 1% | |
| 20 | SIVAGAR Leo | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 12% | 1% | |
| 21 | HE Jason | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 4% | |
| 22 | DE JONG Thijmen J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 29% | |
| 23 | TRAN Richard | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 23% | 5% | 1% |
| 24 | VAN EIKEMA HOMMES Neil B. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 32% | 3% | |
| 25 | GRAY Alex | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% | |
| 26 | WEINGARTEN Solomon (Sol) | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 20% | 3% | |
| 27 | VELO Juan Manuel H. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | |
| 27 | DYER CJ | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% | |
| 29 | SCRIBNER Aidan C. | 100% | 86% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | ZIEBART Jeremy J. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 23% | 3% | |
| 31 | AU Marcus J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 11% | |
| 32 | WALKER William H. | 100% | 100% | 89% | 54% | 17% | 2% | |
| 33 | LIU Felix | 100% | 91% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 34 | GHILDIYAL Manyu | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 38% | 7% | |
| 35 | PELAYO Raphael | 100% | 10% | < 1% | - | - | - | |
| 36 | HAINES Reagan | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 37 | LIU Bennett | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 38 | WANG Xu-Chen | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 39 | DYER Carson C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 40 | RAJPAL Sartaj S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 12% | |
| 41 | ARABACI Jack A. | 100% | 85% | 25% | 3% | - | - | |
| 42 | LIPTON Michael D. | 100% | 66% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 43 | MA Victor | 100% | 33% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 44 | LEONARDINI Barry M. | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 45 | GARRETT Samuel | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 46 | LOUIE Jason | 100% | 77% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | PORTER Corin | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 48 | AMAYA Jonas M. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 49 | ZHANG Michael | 100% | 53% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 50 | SHOEMAKER Thomas P. | 100% | 86% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.