Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DODRILL Grant | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 25% |
| 2 | LIU David J. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | |
| 3 | MOSZCZYNSKI Adam | - | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 36% | 17% |
| 3 | TRAVERS Samir T. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
| 5 | HOUTZ Jackson | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | < 1% |
| 6 | JEAN Noe T. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 10% |
| 7 | XU Luke | 4% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 8 | XU William | 4% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 9 | BOUANANI Zachariah I. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 10 | QIU Le | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 11 | BERGER Oliver | 2% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% | |
| 12 | PORTMANN Stein J. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 13 | NEUHEARDT Peter | 1% | 5% | 19% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 14 | DEMAREST Iain | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
| 15 | SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% |
| 16 | ZHOU Kevin | 1% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 17 | RAJA Arnav | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 3% |
| 18 | MORRILL William | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | |
| 19 | KAYDALIN Artyom | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 20 | SINGER Carson | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | |
| 21 | HASNAH Henry | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | |
| 22 | LE Hayden | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | |
| 23 | BRAR Sanjeet | 8% | 27% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 24 | MORRILL Justin | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | |
| 25 | YAO Jonathan | 2% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% | |
| 26 | KOTOV Leonid | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | TONG ZACHARY | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | |
| 28 | WESLER Logan A. | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 1% | |
| 29 | HAMMERSTROM Jared | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
| 30 | SMITLEY Tyler J. | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 31 | BULL Anderson | 5% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 32 | GINIS Nathan | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 33 | ROBERTS Sam | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 34 | HONG Steven | 2% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 35 | CHANG Brandon | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 6% |
| 36 | CHEONG Heonjae | 1% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 37 | SUBBIAH Prashanth V. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | |
| 38 | NG Jonathan H. | - | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% | |
| 39 | SHASHA Zane | 8% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | |
| 40 | TANG Alex Y. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | |
| 41 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | 29% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | LIU Christopher X. | 14% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 43 | DENNER Maximilian P. | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
| 44 | BERRIO Carter E. | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 45 | FLORES Peter D. | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
| 45 | MAKLIN Edward P. | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 47 | JINICH Ilan R. | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 48 | WANG Eric Y. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% | |
| 49 | ASHBY Ethan J. | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 50 | NGUYEN Andrew | 28% | 40% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | STONE Esmond A. | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 52 | LEITH Jack | 45% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 53 | BRISTOL Brijen | 44% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.