Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DODRILL Grant | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 25% |
| 2 | LIU David J. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% | |
| 3 | MOSZCZYNSKI Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 53% | 17% |
| 3 | TRAVERS Samir T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 18% |
| 5 | HOUTZ Jackson | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | < 1% |
| 6 | JEAN Noe T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 10% |
| 7 | XU Luke | 100% | 96% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 8 | XU William | 100% | 96% | 73% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 9 | BOUANANI Zachariah I. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 10 | QIU Le | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
| 11 | BERGER Oliver | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 4% | |
| 12 | PORTMANN Stein J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 13 | NEUHEARDT Peter | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 14 | DEMAREST Iain | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% |
| 15 | SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 30% |
| 16 | ZHOU Kevin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | RAJA Arnav | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 3% |
| 18 | MORRILL William | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% | |
| 19 | KAYDALIN Artyom | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
| 20 | SINGER Carson | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 10% | |
| 21 | HASNAH Henry | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 22 | LE Hayden | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | |
| 23 | BRAR Sanjeet | 100% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 24 | MORRILL Justin | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | |
| 25 | YAO Jonathan | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 5% | |
| 26 | KOTOV Leonid | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | TONG ZACHARY | 100% | 92% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% | |
| 28 | WESLER Logan A. | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% | |
| 29 | HAMMERSTROM Jared | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 5% | |
| 30 | SMITLEY Tyler J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 31 | BULL Anderson | 100% | 95% | 70% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 32 | GINIS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 8% |
| 33 | ROBERTS Sam | 100% | 97% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 34 | HONG Steven | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 35 | CHANG Brandon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 6% |
| 36 | CHEONG Heonjae | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 37 | SUBBIAH Prashanth V. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% | |
| 38 | NG Jonathan H. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% | |
| 39 | SHASHA Zane | 100% | 92% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
| 40 | TANG Alex Y. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 5% | |
| 41 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | LIU Christopher X. | 100% | 86% | 53% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 43 | DENNER Maximilian P. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 44 | BERRIO Carter E. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 45 | FLORES Peter D. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 45 | MAKLIN Edward P. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 47 | JINICH Ilan R. | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 48 | WANG Eric Y. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 10% | |
| 49 | ASHBY Ethan J. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 50 | NGUYEN Andrew | 100% | 72% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | STONE Esmond A. | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 52 | LEITH Jack | 100% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 53 | BRISTOL Brijen | 100% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.