New Jersey City University - John Moore Athletic Center - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BRANDT Jaden | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 43% | 34% |
2 | CARRINGTON IV William T. | - | - | - | 4% | 31% | 65% | |
3 | KIM Ethan | - | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 66% |
3 | ZHAO Lucas | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 45% | 24% |
5 | BONETTI Brayden | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
6 | FADEL Alexander | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 39% | 15% |
7 | DE SIENA Salvatore | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
8 | NOTOPRADONO Nicholas | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
9 | OH Aster | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 36% | 9% | |
10 | CLARK Aram | - | - | - | 3% | 33% | 64% | |
11 | SALDARINI Glenn | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 32% |
12 | SRIVATS Vedh | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 19% |
13 | BAI Evan | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
14 | BUIKEVICH Ihnat | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% | |
15 | BIVIJI Ali | - | - | 3% | 23% | 55% | 18% | |
16 | PINTO Marcus | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 24% |
17 | OLOUGHLIN Quin | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 29% | 3% | |
18 | DOMINIQUE Remson | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
19 | SUBA Lucas | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
20 | SADHU Neiyam | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
21 | ZHAO Royce | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% | |
22 | LEE Anderson | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 17% | 2% |
23 | CHANG Timothy | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 26% | 6% | - |
24 | PAVLENISHVILI Luke | 7% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
25 | VILEMAITIS Tadas | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
26 | LEE Matthew | - | 6% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
27 | WONG Caleb W. | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
28 | MUNJULURI ruhaan | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
29 | NOVOSYOLOK Zachary | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 39% | 16% | |
30 | SARWAHI Viraat | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
31 | DEELY Hartigan | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 1% |
32 | MENON Arjun | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
33 | PRIEUR Christian F. | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
34 | BALE ATMAN | 1% | 5% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
35 | KENNEDY Tomás | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
36 | RAJMOHAN Arya | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
37 | FORSTED Ian | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 34% | |
38 | LAMTAN Christoffer | 3% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
39 | HU Jayden | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
40 | LOO Jason | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
41 | LIU Ryan | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% |
42 | SHENOY Rowan | 6% | 34% | 41% | 17% | 2% | - | |
43 | BHANDARE Niev | 4% | 25% | 44% | 24% | 3% | - | |
44 | LIU Alexander | 14% | 40% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | |
45 | SONG Nicholas | 22% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
46 | JIANG Terence | 28% | 45% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
47 | ROSADO Sebastian | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
48 | FRANCO James | 14% | 41% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
49 | WEISS Toby | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
50 | SONG Aidan | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
51 | VAHABZADEH Jake R. | 5% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
52 | ARVIND Adhijay | 6% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
53 | OREN Daniel | 8% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | |
54 | TSAI Kai-An (Kash) | 13% | 40% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | |
55 | BROENING-CHAI Jonas | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 40% | 8% | |
56 | ROYCHOUDHURY Aniket | 2% | 19% | 41% | 32% | 6% | - | |
57 | FIROOZI Sam | 52% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
58 | LOSQUADRO Joseph | 14% | 47% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
59 | BARENBOYM Michael | 10% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
60 | DOSTAL Maximilian | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | - |
61 | BHERWANI Ishaan | 52% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
62 | LEE John | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | |
63 | SAYAR Luke | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
64 | CAFFREY Ethan | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
65 | LI Aidan | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
66 | CHUNG Loden | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.