New Jersey City University - John Moore Athletic Center - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CLARK Aram | - | - | - | - | 1% | 18% | 80% |
| 2 | SRIVATS Vedh | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 20% |
| 3 | SALDARINI Glenn | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 32% | |
| 3 | DOMINIQUE Remson | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 64% | |
| 5 | BIVIJI Ali | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 26% | |
| 6 | NOVOSYOLOK Zachary | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% | |
| 7 | MORGAN Abrahm H. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 46% | 15% |
| 8 | ARVIND Adhijay | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 9 | CARRINGTON IV William T. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 38% | 54% |
| 10 | PINTO Marcus | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 29% |
| 11 | DAI Zihou | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% | |
| 12 | DOSTAL Maximilian | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 44% | 9% | |
| 13 | SONG Aidan | 1% | 5% | 18% | 30% | 29% | 14% | 3% |
| 14 | ZHAO Royce | - | 1% | 7% | 20% | 33% | 29% | 10% |
| 15 | KOZLOV Lucas | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 16 | BAI Evan | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 19% | |
| 17 | OREN Daniel | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 21% | 2% |
| 18 | LOO Jason | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 10% | |
| 19 | LAMTAN Christoffer | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 20 | AGARWAAL Yohan | - | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 35% | 11% |
| 21 | IMANUEL Ethan | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 22 | BHANDARE Niev | 1% | 12% | 37% | 37% | 12% | 1% | |
| 23 | LUCAS William | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 24 | BARENBOYM Michael | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 25 | SAYAR Luke | 3% | 13% | 28% | 31% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 26 | MARTINSON Torm | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 26% | 11% | 2% |
| 27 | CHAVAN Aditya | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 27 | HALPER Benjamin | 1% | 15% | 39% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 29 | LIU Ryan | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 30 | CHENG Sawyer | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 31 | LOTTNER Samuel | 5% | 21% | 32% | 26% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 32 | CHANG Timothy | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 33 | MIAO Heqi | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 18% | 2% |
| 34 | BIVIJI Adam | - | - | 3% | 19% | 42% | 32% | 3% |
| 35 | LOSQUADRO Joseph | 8% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 36 | FOUX Jonathan | 6% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 36 | CHAN Ewan | 37% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 38 | SONG Nicholas | 26% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | SUN Stephen | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 40 | LEE Lucas | 2% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 41 | WU Vincent | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 42 | LIM JUWANA Maximilian | 2% | 10% | 24% | 32% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 43 | JI Johnson | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
| 43 | WANG tiger | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 45 | LEE Blake | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 46 | SAUVE Quinn | 11% | 42% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | DATTILIO Aidan | 41% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 48 | HU Jayden | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 49 | BROOKS Drake | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 50 | LAU Kyrus | 4% | 18% | 31% | 28% | 14% | 4% | - |
| 50 | O’LOUGHLIN Jacob | 11% | 35% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | LIN Jacob | 24% | 40% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | HOWARTH Hayes | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 54 | PREVOST Landon | 15% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | ZHANG Howard | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 56 | HUANG Bret | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | FIROOZI Alex | 54% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 58 | SHAPIRO Leo | 8% | 32% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 59 | TANJGA Luka | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.