New Jersey City University - John Moore Athletic Center - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CLARK Aram | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 80% |
| 2 | SRIVATS Vedh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 20% |
| 3 | SALDARINI Glenn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 32% | |
| 3 | DOMINIQUE Remson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% | |
| 5 | BIVIJI Ali | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% | |
| 6 | NOVOSYOLOK Zachary | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 12% | |
| 7 | MORGAN Abrahm H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 15% |
| 8 | ARVIND Adhijay | 100% | 93% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 9 | CARRINGTON IV William T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 54% |
| 10 | PINTO Marcus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 29% |
| 11 | DAI Zihou | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% | |
| 12 | DOSTAL Maximilian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% | 9% | |
| 13 | SONG Aidan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 46% | 17% | 3% |
| 14 | ZHAO Royce | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 72% | 39% | 10% |
| 15 | KOZLOV Lucas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
| 16 | BAI Evan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 19% | |
| 17 | OREN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% | 2% |
| 18 | LOO Jason | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | |
| 19 | LAMTAN Christoffer | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 20 | AGARWAAL Yohan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 46% | 11% |
| 21 | IMANUEL Ethan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 22 | BHANDARE Niev | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 13% | 1% | |
| 23 | LUCAS William | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
| 24 | BARENBOYM Michael | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 25 | SAYAR Luke | 100% | 97% | 84% | 56% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 26 | MARTINSON Torm | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 27 | CHAVAN Aditya | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
| 27 | HALPER Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 84% | 45% | 10% | 1% | |
| 29 | LIU Ryan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
| 30 | CHENG Sawyer | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 31 | LOTTNER Samuel | 100% | 95% | 74% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 32 | CHANG Timothy | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
| 33 | MIAO Heqi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% | 2% |
| 34 | BIVIJI Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% | 3% |
| 35 | LOSQUADRO Joseph | 100% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 36 | FOUX Jonathan | 100% | 94% | 66% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 36 | CHAN Ewan | 100% | 63% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 38 | SONG Nicholas | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | SUN Stephen | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 40 | LEE Lucas | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 41 | WU Vincent | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 42 | LIM JUWANA Maximilian | 100% | 98% | 88% | 64% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
| 43 | JI Johnson | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 3% | |
| 43 | WANG tiger | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 45 | LEE Blake | 100% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 46 | SAUVE Quinn | 100% | 89% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | DATTILIO Aidan | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 48 | HU Jayden | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 49 | BROOKS Drake | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 50 | LAU Kyrus | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 50 | O’LOUGHLIN Jacob | 100% | 89% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | LIN Jacob | 100% | 76% | 36% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | HOWARTH Hayes | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 54 | PREVOST Landon | 100% | 85% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | ZHANG Howard | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 56 | HUANG Bret | 100% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | FIROOZI Alex | 100% | 46% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 58 | SHAPIRO Leo | 100% | 92% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 59 | TANJGA Luka | 100% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.