Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | JACOB Lena | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 39% | 49% |
2 | JING Emily | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 17% |
3 | CHO Cameron S. | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
3 | HOOSHI Erica S. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% |
5 | GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 5% | |
6 | KHOO Lauren A. | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | |
7 | DAVIA Daniella V. | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% | |
8 | LEE Bethany W. | 6% | 25% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
9 | LEE Alina | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 23% |
10 | VOHRA Anusha | 15% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
11 | IBEN Claire L. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
12 | SOOD Ishani S. | 2% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% | |
13 | LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) | - | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% | |
14 | RASO Sofia G. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% | |
15 | LEE Paulina | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
16 | KOROL Dana | 3% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
17 | SHEN Sophia H. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 9% |
18 | TAKAMIZAWA Yukari | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% |
19 | YAMAGUCHI Kate M. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 21% | |
20 | SEAL Grace (Gracie) C. | 1% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
21 | GUERRA Sofia E. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | - |
22 | CAO Arianna L. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 26% | |
23 | KIM Katherine | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
24 | CHO Taylor S. | 5% | 30% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - | |
25 | YHIP Mikaela M. | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% | |
26 | FAN Elaine | 4% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
27 | JING Alexandra | - | - | 4% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 6% |
28 | CHEN Nicole Y. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
29 | MILLER Naomi E. | 3% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 3% | |
30 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 40% | 15% | |
31 | KIM Elisabeth (Gracie) | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | |
32 | LOCKE Savannah | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
33 | DUAN Konnie | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
34 | PENTSAKOV Margaret | 27% | 44% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
35 | UPTON Elizabeth | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
36 | PENG Amber L. | 13% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - | |
37 | LOW Sharon J. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | |
38 | HO Rachel E. | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | |
39 | YOUNG Audrey S. | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
40 | HOLLAND Naomi | 19% | 48% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
41 | PRIETO Sofia M. | 6% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
42 | HEISER Anna M. | 49% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
43 | WANG Catherine K. | 22% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
44 | YEN Natalie | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
45 | ZAMELIS Madelyn | 30% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.