Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | JACOB Lena | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
| 2 | JING Emily | V V D V V V | V V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 3 | CHO Cameron S. | D V V D D V | V V V V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 3 | HOOSHI Erica S. | D V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 5 | GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa | V V V V V | V V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
| 6 | KHOO Lauren A. | V V V D V | V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 7 | DAVIA Daniella V. | V D D V V | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 8 | LEE Bethany W. | V D V D D | V V V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 9 | LEE Alina | V V V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 10 | VOHRA Anusha | D D V V V V | V D | 1.5 | 4 | +2.5 |
| 11 | IBEN Claire L. | D V D V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 12 | SOOD Ishani S. | D V V V D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 13 | LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) | V V D D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 14 | RASO Sofia G. | V V D D V | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 15 | LEE Paulina | V V D D V D | V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 16 | KOROL Dana | D D D D V | V V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 17 | SHEN Sophia H. | V V V V D V | D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 18 | TAKAMIZAWA Yukari | V V V D V V | D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 19 | YAMAGUCHI Kate M. | V V V V D | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 20 | SEAL Grace (Gracie) C. | D V V V V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 21 | GUERRA Sofia E. | V D V V D V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 22 | CAO Arianna L. | V V D V D | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 23 | KIM Katherine | V D D V V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 24 | CHO Taylor S. | D V V V D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 25 | YHIP Mikaela M. | V V V D D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 26 | FAN Elaine | D D V V V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 27 | JING Alexandra | D V V D V D | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 28 | CHEN Nicole Y. | V V D V D D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 29 | MILLER Naomi E. | D D V D V | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 30 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | D D V D V | V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 31 | KIM Elisabeth (Gracie) | D V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 32 | LOCKE Savannah | V D D V D D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 33 | DUAN Konnie | D V V D V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 34 | PENTSAKOV Margaret | D D D D V V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 35 | UPTON Elizabeth | D D D V V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 36 | PENG Amber L. | V D D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 37 | LOW Sharon J. | D D D V D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 38 | HO Rachel E. | D D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 39 | YOUNG Audrey S. | V D D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 40 | HOLLAND Naomi | D D D V D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 41 | PRIETO Sofia M. | V D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 42 | HEISER Anna M. | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 43 | WANG Catherine K. | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 44 | YEN Natalie | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 45 | ZAMELIS Madelyn | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.