New Jersey City University - John Moore Athletic Center - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SPEARS Mya B | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 37% |
| 2 | DAMBAL Sasha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 19% |
| 3 | CHIARELLI Valentina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 49% |
| 3 | HU Anna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% |
| 5 | MYAT Chloe | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 16% | |
| 6 | KWON Ava | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% | |
| 7 | GUGALA Hanna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
| 8 | SHEN Emily | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
| 9 | KHOST Maeve | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 4% |
| 10 | YERENKOVA Ameliia | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 11 | PROBASCO Leila | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 29% | |
| 12 | HALPERIN Elizabeth H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 16% | |
| 13 | KOHLBERGER Noelle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% | 36% |
| 14 | LOO Kaitlyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% |
| 15 | GONZALEZ Veronika | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
| 16 | LEIGH Adalene | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 17 | CROOKS Riley | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 14% | 1% |
| 18 | TA-ZHOU Emma | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% |
| 19 | BAIREDDY Maya | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 20 | SHMULER Fiona | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 28% | 4% | |
| 21 | KIM Audrey | 100% | 97% | 77% | 33% | 6% | - | |
| 22 | IANNUZZI Lucy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 9% | - |
| 22 | UEMOTO Lynn | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 24 | KWON Ava | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 21% | 2% | - |
| 25 | GENTILE Vittoria | 100% | 87% | 54% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 26 | WONG Charlene | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 27 | LEE Kaitlin | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 28 | PALMIERI Giuliana M. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 29 | LIANG Claire | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
| 30 | WANG JiaQi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 24% | |
| 31 | BORGUETA Madison | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 32 | CHOI Charlotte | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 33 | STADNIK Emilia | 100% | 98% | 85% | 58% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 34 | BAIK Sarah | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 35 | CASTELO Soleil | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
| 36 | FUNG Iris | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 9% | |
| 37 | LEOU Korina | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% | |
| 38 | ALAMI Amira | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 39 | ZHANG Ashley | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 13% | 2% |
| 40 | ZHANG Emily | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
| 41 | WENG Amber | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 42 | BROWN Aria | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 43 | NIU Jessica | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 44 | MACKAY Katherine | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 45 | ENG Madeleine | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 46 | CHAN Madeleine V. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 68% | 37% | 12% | 2% |
| 47 | VISWANATHAN Nishka | 100% | 90% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 48 | PARK Haylie | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 49 | YAO Annabelle | 100% | 83% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | ROHATGI Saanvi | 100% | 84% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | BHARDWAJ Riya | 100% | 90% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | LEE Grace | 100% | 88% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 53 | GALLAGHER Isabella | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 54 | YUN Madison | 100% | 68% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | KHERA Anya | 100% | 71% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 56 | SONG Emily | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 57 | FUNG Maya | 100% | 54% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 58 | YEUNG Sidney | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | MANSPERGER Gia | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 60 | VATS Ishita | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.