University of Houston - Downtown - Wellness and Success Center - Houston, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MEJIA Matthew D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 54% | 11% |
| 2 | RUFFNER Blake W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 63% |
| 3 | QUINONES Diego A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 39% |
| 3 | FINNEY Lorenz | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 11% |
| 5 | RAJ Jay | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
| 6 | STANTON Timothy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% | |
| 7 | LARA Diego | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% | 12% |
| 8 | ACUNA Gabriel G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 58% |
| 9 | ANDRIC Borna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
| 10 | TRUBETSKI David | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 26% | 4% | |
| 11 | KIM Adrian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 12 | RAMIREZ David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 48% | 10% |
| 13 | CHEZ Nolan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 29% | 5% | - |
| 14 | KIM Brian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
| 14 | CHEN Leetyan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 16 | JOHNSON Chance | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 17 | GIDDENS James Oliver | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 18 | KIM Andy | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
| 19 | PIERCE Cody | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 20 | SANCHEZ Emanuel | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% | - |
| 21 | CAPRA Ethan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 7% | |
| 22 | DAI Christopher | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 23 | CLARK Benjamin | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 24 | MORRIS Matthew | 100% | 91% | 46% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 25 | BARRETT Austin | 100% | 94% | 61% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 26 | CHEW Aaron | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 27 | PAVLOVIC Alexander | 100% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 28 | CREBBS Calvin | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 29 | LEY Diego | 100% | 83% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 30 | FARMER Marshal | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 31 | FLYNT Hayden | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 32 | MCCOY Camden | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 33 | POOLE James M. | 100% | 97% | 71% | 24% | 3% | - | - |
| 34 | CHAN ShingHang | 100% | 92% | 59% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.