Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LE Hayden | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 2 | LIU David J. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 3 | YANG Ziyi | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
| 3 | TONG ZACHARY | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
| 5 | TRAVERS Samir T. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
| 6 | ZHOU Kevin | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 7 | RAJA Arnav | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 8 | DODRILL Grant | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% |
| 9 | TANG Alex Y. | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 7% |
| 10 | BERGER Oliver | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 11 | SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 26% |
| 12 | SHASHA Zane | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 13 | WANG Eric Y. | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 7% |
| 14 | NEUHEARDT Peter | 1% | 6% | 19% | 31% | 28% | 13% | 2% |
| 15 | DENNER Maximilian P. | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 16 | HAMMERSTROM Jared | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 17 | HOUTZ Jackson | - | 4% | 15% | 29% | 31% | 17% | 4% |
| 18 | KOTOV Leonid | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 18 | KAYDALIN Artyom | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
| 20 | MORRILL William | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 21 | MOSZCZYNSKI Adam | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% |
| 22 | LUO George F. | 1% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 23 | FLORES Peter D. | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% | |
| 24 | NG Jonathan H. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 25 | XU Luke | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 26 | MAKLIN Edward P. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 27 | CHEONG Heonjae | 1% | 9% | 23% | 32% | 24% | 10% | 2% |
| 28 | XU William | 8% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 29 | YUN Jake | 2% | 9% | 24% | 32% | 23% | 9% | 1% |
| 30 | GOERING Ashton H. | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 31 | GHAYALOD ansh | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 32 | JINICH Ilan R. | 5% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 33 | SMITLEY Tyler J. | 1% | 7% | 21% | 31% | 26% | 12% | 2% |
| 34 | CHANG Brandon | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% | |
| 35 | HASNAH Henry | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | |
| 36 | YAO Jonathan | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 28% | 9% |
| 37 | MORRILL Justin | - | 4% | 16% | 30% | 30% | 16% | 3% |
| 38 | HONG Steven | 2% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 39 | CHON Taylor A. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 40 | GINIS Nathan | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 41 | BERRIO Carter E. | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 42 | SUBBIAH Prashanth V. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 43 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | 7% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 44 | ROSBERG Dashiell W. | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 45 | BULL Anderson | 7% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 46 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 47 | EDELMAN Seth A. | 16% | 42% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | LEITH Jack | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 49 | BRISTOL Brijen | 52% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 50 | YOUNG Brendon | 2% | 11% | 26% | 32% | 22% | 8% | 1% |
| 51 | HUANG Alexander C. | 7% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 51 | LIU Christopher X. | 17% | 36% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 53 | NGUYEN Andrew | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | BRAR Sanjeet | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 55 | STONE Esmond A. | 20% | 40% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.