Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LE Hayden | V V V D V V | V V V V V | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 2 | LIU David J. | V D D V V V | V V V V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 3 | YANG Ziyi | V V V D D V | V V V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 3 | TONG ZACHARY | V V D V V | V V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 5 | TRAVERS Samir T. | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 6 | ZHOU Kevin | D V V D V V | V V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 7 | RAJA Arnav | V V V D V D | V V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 8 | DODRILL Grant | V D D V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 9 | TANG Alex Y. | V V V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 6 | +2.1 |
| 10 | BERGER Oliver | V V D V V V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 11 | SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. | V D V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 12 | SHASHA Zane | D V V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 13 | WANG Eric Y. | V V V V D V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 14 | NEUHEARDT Peter | V D V V D V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 15 | DENNER Maximilian P. | V V D D V V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 16 | HAMMERSTROM Jared | V D V D V D | V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 17 | HOUTZ Jackson | V V V V D V | D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 18 | KOTOV Leonid | D V V V D V | V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 18 | KAYDALIN Artyom | D V V V V D | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 20 | MORRILL William | D V V V V D | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 21 | MOSZCZYNSKI Adam | V V V D D V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 22 | LUO George F. | V V V D V D | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 23 | FLORES Peter D. | V D V V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 24 | NG Jonathan H. | V D V D D V | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 25 | XU Luke | D D V D V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 26 | MAKLIN Edward P. | D V D V V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 27 | CHEONG Heonjae | D D V V D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 28 | XU William | D D V V V D | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 29 | YUN Jake | D V D D D V | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 30 | GOERING Ashton H. | D D D V V D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 31 | GHAYALOD ansh | V V D D D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 32 | JINICH Ilan R. | D D D D V D | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 33 | SMITLEY Tyler J. | V V V V D D | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 34 | CHANG Brandon | D V V V D | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 35 | HASNAH Henry | V D V D V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 36 | YAO Jonathan | D V D V V D | D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 37 | MORRILL Justin | D D D V V V | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 38 | HONG Steven | V V D V D D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 39 | CHON Taylor A. | V D D V D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 40 | GINIS Nathan | V D D V D D | D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 41 | BERRIO Carter E. | D D D V V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 42 | SUBBIAH Prashanth V. | V D D V D D | D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 43 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | D V D D V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 44 | ROSBERG Dashiell W. | D D D D V V | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 45 | BULL Anderson | D D D V D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 46 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | D V D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 47 | EDELMAN Seth A. | D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 48 | LEITH Jack | D V D D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 49 | BRISTOL Brijen | D D V D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 50 | YOUNG Brendon | V D D D D D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 51 | HUANG Alexander C. | D V D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 51 | LIU Christopher X. | D D D D D V | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 53 | NGUYEN Andrew | D D D V D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 54 | BRAR Sanjeet | D D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
| 55 | STONE Esmond A. | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.