Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | JING Alexandra | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 2 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | V D V D V | V V V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 3 | SOOD Ishani S. | D V V V D | V V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 3 | HOOSHI Erica S. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 5 | CHO Gracie L. | V V V V D | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 6 | SHEN Sophia H. | V V V D V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 7 | LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) | V V D V V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 8 | SEAL Grace (Gracie) C. | V D D V V | V V V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 9 | DAVIA Daniella V. | V V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 10 | TAKAMIZAWA Yukari | V V D V V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 11 | GUERRA Sofia E. | D V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 12 | FERNANDES Thea | V V V V D | V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 13 | CHO Taylor S. | D D V V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 14 | GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa | V D D V V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 15 | CHEN Kelly | V V D V D | V V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 16 | KIM Katherine | D D D D D | V V D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 17 | LUNG Katerina | V D V V V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 18 | LEE Bethany W. | V V V D V | D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 19 | CHEN Allison V. | V D V D V V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 20 | KHOO Lauren A. | V V V D D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 21 | KIM Elisabeth (Gracie) | V D D V V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 22 | UPTON Elizabeth | D V V V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 23 | WANG Catherine K. | D V V D V | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 24 | PRIETO Sofia M. | V V D D V D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 25 | LOCKE Savannah | V D V V D D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 26 | PENTSAKOV Margaret | V D D V D V | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 27 | LEE Paulina | D V V D D | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 28 | JING Emily | V V D D D | V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 29 | MILLER Naomi E. | D V D V D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 30 | PENG Amber L. | V V D D D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 31 | WU Irene M. | D D D V D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 32 | ZHAO Sophie L. | D D D V D | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 33 | KOROL Dana | V D V D D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 34 | DUAN Konnie | D D V D V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 35 | YHIP Mikaela M. | D D V D V | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 36 | FAN Elaine | D V V D D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 37 | HOLLAND Naomi | D D D D V | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 38 | HO Rachel E. | D D D D V | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 39 | SHEN Lydia | D D D D V D | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 40 | WHITESIDES Ella K. | D D V D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 41 | CHO Cameron S. | D D D D D D | D | 3.3 | 0 | -3.3 |
| 42 | VOHRA Anusha | D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 43 | HEISER Anna M. | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 44 | ZAMELIS Madelyn | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.