Fortune RYC/RJCC

Youth 10 Men’s Saber (Y10MS)

Saturday, March 14, 2026 at 3:30 PM

Register

Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1611 1887 - 1417
5 - 8 1419 1528 - 1215
9 - 16 1285 1763 - 952
17 - 26 1244 2500 - 431

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Horikawa, Xander West Coast Fencing Academy U 1887 1379.76
2 Qiao, Jason LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 1417 1058.88
3 Chang, Jarrett U 1620 1058.01
4 Galang, Aiden Bay Area Fencing Club U 1520 1020.70
5 Li, Nathan Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 1518 992.36
6 Jiang, Hardy Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 1415 770.74
7 Yan, Kaysen Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 1215 765.72
8 Wang, Alex Eagle Blade Fencers Club U 1528 748.78
9 Yang, Collin South Bay Fencing Academy U 1224 676.72
10 Xia, Daniel Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 1363 576.64
11 Hao, Jefferson Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 1317 548.77
12 Cheng, Daniel West Coast Fencing Academy U 1233 424.37
13 Tam, Ethan West Coast Fencing Academy U 1035 422.60
14 Lee, Damian Eagle Blade Fencers Club U 1763 273.79
15 Woo, Jonathan Premier Fencing Academy U 1394 48.72
16 Jiang, Harry Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 952 17.33
17 Wang, Grayson West Coast Fencing Academy U 2500 < 0
18 Jia, Andrew Eagle Blade Fencers Club U 2500 < 0
19 Shetty, Vikram South Bay Fencing Academy U 810 < 0
20 Lee, Albert South Bay Fencing Academy U 1409 < 0
21 Leung, Ian West Coast Fencing Academy U 891 < 0
22 Hwang, Leo Premier Fencing Academy U 1685 < 0
23 fernandez, leo LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 568 < 0
24 Jung, Diego Laguna Fencing Center U 431 < 0
25 Zhang, Jiahang Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 980 < 0
26 Djunaedi, Brann West Coast Fencing Academy U 666 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!