Fortune SYC/RJCC

Youth 10 Men’s Saber (Y10MS)

Saturday, May 2, 2026 at 8:00 AM

Register

Anaheim Convention Center - Hall E - Anaheim, CA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1635 1968 - 1416
5 - 8 1418 1620 - 1215
9 - 16 1194 1528 - 863
17 - 26 1181 2500 - 431

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Horikawa, Xander West Coast Fencing Academy U 1968 1493.42
2 Lee, Hubert Junhu Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 1609 1229.88
3 Galang, Aiden The Fencing Center U 1548 1094.67
4 Qiao, Jason LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 1416 1066.19
5 Chang, Jarrett U 1620 1058.01
6 Li, Nathan Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 1511 1012.97
7 Chen, Donovan LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 1326 1008.21
8 Yan, Kaysen Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 1215 765.72
9 Wang, Alex Eagle Blade Fencers Club U 1528 748.78
10 Petrosyan, David Nazlymov Fencing Foundation U 1425 564.82
11 Hao, Jefferson Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 1317 548.77
12 Kim Zoller, Jude PDX Fencing U 1230 544.58
13 Cheng, Daniel West Coast Fencing Academy U 1233 424.37
14 Severt, David ORO Fencing Club U 919 422.62
15 Tam, Ethan West Coast Fencing Academy U 1035 422.60
16 Lin, Rongcheng Noah Bay Area Fencing Club U 863 368.08
17 Xu, Ethan LA International Fencing U 1193 229.61
18 Jia, Andrew Eagle Blade Fencers Club U 2500 < 0
19 Wan, Andrew West Coast Fencing Academy U 2500 < 0
20 Shetty, Vikram South Bay Fencing Academy U 810 < 0
21 Khan, Zorayz Globus Fencing Academy U 862 < 0
22 Leung, Ian West Coast Fencing Academy U 891 < 0
23 fernandez, leo LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 568 < 0
24 Jung, Diego Laguna Fencing Center U 431 < 0
25 Davidson, Ethan Avant Garde Fencers Club, Inc (CA) (AGFC) U 1078 < 0
26 Zhang, Jiahang Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 980 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!