Mission Fencing Center - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YANG Emma | - | - | - | 2% | 17% | 44% | 37% |
| 2 | YANG Iris | - | - | - | - | 5% | 36% | 59% |
| 3 | CASCONE Emily | - | - | - | 4% | 24% | 53% | 19% |
| 3 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | - | - | - | - | - | 8% | 91% |
| 5 | PEVZNER Nicole | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 42% |
| 6 | LI Han (Helina) | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% |
| 7 | SHEN Emilia | - | - | - | - | 6% | 37% | 56% |
| 8 | KUMAMOTO Shino | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 36% | 10% |
| 9 | MCSHERRY Ava | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 40% | 49% |
| 10 | CHO Emily (Euran) | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 11 | ZELDIN Nadia | - | - | 3% | 20% | 44% | 29% | 4% |
| 12 | KAPRAN Anastasia | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 4% |
| 13 | SIROTA Francis | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% |
| 14 | BROWN Lola | - | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% |
| 15 | FENG Grace | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 64% |
| 16 | SHENG Katherine | - | 1% | 18% | 45% | 30% | 5% | - |
| 17 | WANG Joanna | - | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 49% | 16% |
| 18 | TSIMIKLIS Aphrodite | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 27% | 1% |
| 19 | WANG Amabel | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 44% | 17% |
| 20 | FIELD Elizabeth | - | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 40% | 14% |
| 21 | LIN Yunong | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 22 | HARRIS Julia | - | - | 4% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 6% |
| 23 | FENG Audrey | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 19% | 1% |
| 24 | CAI Ilana | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 13% | 2% |
| 25 | TANG Melody Fujiao | - | - | 2% | 17% | 42% | 34% | 5% |
| 26 | HAO Danica | - | - | 11% | 38% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
| 27 | JOO Natalie | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% |
| 28 | LIU Caydence | 1% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 29 | BING Charlotte | - | 4% | 22% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 30 | ROBERTS Anastasia | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 31 | LI Savannah | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 32 | CAO Kayla | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 33 | EYER Brooke | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 31% | 8% | - |
| 34 | MCFARLANE Asha | - | 8% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 35 | DONG Iris | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 2% |
| 36 | DE CASTRO Kai | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 37 | LI Beryl | 13% | 41% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | BAULIN Zoya | 42% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 39 | ZHANG Zoey | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 40 | PEDERSEN Clara | 1% | 13% | 37% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 41 | YACOBUCCI Nadia | - | 3% | 39% | 42% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 42 | PELLE Lia | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | LIU Jenna | 41% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 43 | LIU Jingyi (Eva) | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 45 | YIN Chloe | 7% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 46 | SINGH Evangelina | 21% | 47% | 26% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 47 | MCSHERRY Kayla | 1% | 8% | 30% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 48 | PAN Yiran | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 49 | BO Iris | 20% | 50% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 49 | KRAHE Annika | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 51 | CAO Amelie | 23% | 66% | 10% | - | - | - | - |
| 52 | GOMEZ Sofia | 64% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 53 | ZHANG Caroline | 32% | 46% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 54 | XU-FERGUSON Victoria | 1% | 10% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 55 | SHIN Elizabeth | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 56 | HAFEZ Sahar | 4% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 57 | OTTAVIANO Maris | 55% | 39% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 58 | GE Deanna | 17% | 42% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | CHOI Cara | 72% | 28% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 60 | XU-FERGUSON Genevieve | 13% | 40% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | ORBÉ-AUSTIN Maya | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | LI Doreen | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 63 | CHAN Kaitlyn | 2% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.