Birmingham Fencing Club - Birmingham, AL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | SUNDQUIST Matthew | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 43% | 16% |
2 | CRAMER Bradley | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% | |
3 | RAY William | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 40% |
3 | WILLIAMS Eli | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 18% |
5 | CARRIE Konnor | - | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
6 | PARCELEWICZ John M. | - | 6% | 26% | 43% | 22% | 3% |
7 | KERTESZ Stefan G. | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 44% | 13% |
8 | ALLEY Everett T | - | - | 3% | 19% | 43% | 35% |
9 | ADIBZADEH Mehrdad | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 8% |
10 | WONG Garrick G. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 35% |
11 | CALINSKY Edward | - | 11% | 37% | 37% | 14% | 2% |
12 | ELLIOTT Wyatt | - | 7% | 33% | 43% | 17% | |
13 | SMITH Andrew | - | 7% | 34% | 44% | 14% | |
14 | CORDOVA Colin | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
15 | WHALEN Garrett | 1% | 30% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - |
16 | WENTWORTH Ashley | 20% | 45% | 30% | 5% | - | - |
17 | MOYNIHAN Jones | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
18 | FORD Tillman | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
19 | SOPER Adam | 3% | 47% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
20 | MACALUSO Matthew | 12% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - |
21 | KLITTEN Robert | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
22 | FAN Yuchen | 4% | 25% | 45% | 22% | 4% | - |
23 | RESTER Christopher | 7% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
24 | TAYLOR Thomas | 6% | 38% | 39% | 15% | 2% | - |
25 | ETHRIDGE Christopher | 8% | 35% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - |
26 | REEVES Ruby | 54% | 38% | 7% | 1% | - | |
27 | ALLEY Mary Ellis | 46% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
28 | HAAS Lindsey | 49% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
29 | MASRI Rania | 4% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 6% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.