Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | EMMERT Jp | D V D D V | V V V V V | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 2 | DAZEY Jason T. | V V D V V D | V V V V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 3 | SERAFYM Damian | V V V V D | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 3 | MILLER Jackson | V D V D V | V V V D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
| 5 | LAUER Michael | V V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 6 | REED Dusty (Allen) | V V D V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 7 | BETTS Jr Anthony P. | V V V V V D | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 8 | TARR Robert | V V D V V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 9 | ELDRIDGE Darrell | V V V V V V | D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
| 10 | RIPLEY Ian | V V V D V V | D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 11 | PRIJATEL John R. | V V V V D | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 12 | WINGET William (Bill) D. | D V V V V D | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 13 | SWANSON Dave | D D V V V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 14 | BAKKE Alexander | V V D V D D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 15 | HE Lingyun Matthew | V D V D D V | V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 16 | KELBLEY Newt J. | D D V V D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 17 | CHRISTIAN John R. | D D V V D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 18 | MANAUGH Calliope | V D D D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 19 | BRENNEMAN Adam | D D V D V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 20 | MILLER Hayden | D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 21 | WANG Peter | D D D D V D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 22 | MILLER Brent | D D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 23 | ORGAN Jason | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 24 | ATWELL Madelyn | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 24 | BESEL Natalie | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 26 | HUBBARD Kelsi | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.