Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | EMMERT Jp | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 2 | DAZEY Jason T. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 44% | 27% |
| 3 | SERAFYM Damian | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 7% | |
| 3 | MILLER Jackson | 20% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 5 | LAUER Michael | - | - | 5% | 25% | 45% | 25% | |
| 6 | REED Dusty (Allen) | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 7 | BETTS Jr Anthony P. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 8 | TARR Robert | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
| 9 | ELDRIDGE Darrell | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 32% | 11% |
| 10 | RIPLEY Ian | - | 1% | 9% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 11 | PRIJATEL John R. | - | - | 6% | 36% | 43% | 15% | |
| 12 | WINGET William (Bill) D. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 13 | SWANSON Dave | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 43% | 18% | |
| 14 | BAKKE Alexander | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 15 | HE Lingyun Matthew | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 16 | KELBLEY Newt J. | 1% | 5% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 17 | CHRISTIAN John R. | - | 2% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% | |
| 18 | MANAUGH Calliope | 9% | 41% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 19 | BRENNEMAN Adam | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 20 | MILLER Hayden | 23% | 45% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 21 | WANG Peter | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 22 | MILLER Brent | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 23 | ORGAN Jason | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 24 | ATWELL Madelyn | 34% | 47% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 24 | BESEL Natalie | 24% | 50% | 26% | 1% | - | - | |
| 26 | HUBBARD Kelsi | 15% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.