Motor City RJCC/RYC

Youth 12 Women’s Foil (Y12WF)

Sunday, May 3, 2026 at 8:00 AM

Register

Elite Sportsplex - Waterford, MI

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1502 1645 - 1398
5 - 8 1315 1417 - 1182
9 - 16 1053 1181 - 891
17 - 25 833 1105 - 620

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Kim, Yuna Renaissance Fencing Club E25 1645 1382.37
2 Xu, Charlene Pittsburgh Fencers Club U 1459 1162.91
3 Gonzalez, Lauren Renaissance Fencing Club U 1505 1154.81
4 Farooqi, Eliora Renaissance Fencing Club U 1398 1100.92
5 Jiang, Mujing Renaissance Fencing Club U 1417 1053.90
6 Lee, Eun-Hae Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy U 1314 955.27
7 Welter, Gemma Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy U 1346 946.05
8 Fang, Savannah Renaissance Fencing Club U 1182 905.27
9 Li, Claire Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy U 1181 792.30
10 Jiménez pelay, Claudia Renaissance Fencing Club U 1160 640.69
11 Hewitt, Madison Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy U 1035 611.86
12 Gonzalez, Alexandra Renaissance Fencing Club U 1002 572.14
13 Lopus, Marlena Renaissance Fencing Club U 1041 489.16
14 Yu, Angelina Axis Fencing Club U 1137 459.23
15 Xu, Scarlett Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy U 979 457.39
16 Liu, Doris Eminence Fencing Academy U 891 372.48
17 Rog, Jacqueline Twin Cities Fencing Club U 1105 308.84
18 Currier-Blagg, Bryn Renaissance Fencing Club U 875 305.03
19 Ma, Annabella Renaissance Fencing Club U 876 240.62
20 Kumar, Leela Renaissance Fencing Club U 935 237.62
21 pan, Nina U 937 19.37
22 Ganocy, Sloane Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy U 730 < 0
23 Huang, Charise Renaissance Fencing Club U 636 < 0
24 Na, Adelaide RedStar Fencing Club Chicago U 787 < 0
25 Che, Vera Twin Cities Fencing Club U 620 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!