Raleigh SJCC & Division II North American Cup

Div II Women's Saber

Saturday, June 3, 2023 at 3:00 PM

Raleigh Convention Center - Raleigh, NC, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 FEIG Sela 100% 99% 90% 64% 28% 5%
2 LIU Yifei 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 77% 35%
3 ALFARACHE Gabriella C. 100% 100% 99% 92% 69% 33% 7%
3 HUAI Delilah 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 37%
5 GRAJALES Hannah E. 100% 100% 99% 90% 66% 31% 6%
6 DAI Olivia 100% 100% 99% 95% 75% 39% 8%
7 CROOKS Riley 100% 96% 77% 44% 16% 3% -
8 SCHAIBLE Sofia L. 100% 99% 93% 71% 36% 8%
9 KONDEV Elizabeth 100% 100% 96% 81% 48% 14%
10 MEDVINSKY Alexandra 100% 100% 98% 85% 51% 14%
11 BOYNTON Ainsley 100% 99% 91% 67% 32% 7%
12 MERCHANT Aishwarya 100% 96% 79% 48% 18% 4% -
13 MANN Sophia J. 100% 100% 100% 96% 81% 48% 14%
14 CARTER Keely 100% 99% 91% 67% 32% 8% 1%
15 LIGH Erenei J. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 46%
16 DUDNICK Morgan 100% 99% 92% 71% 37% 10% 1%
17 HAMMERSTROM Aria 100% 98% 87% 60% 27% 7% 1%
18 FAN Grace 100% 100% 100% 95% 75% 38% 9%
19 XU Emily T. 100% 100% 96% 79% 46% 15% 2%
20 LUKASHENKO Angelina 100% 100% 100% 97% 79% 35%
21 ZENG Sarah 100% 99% 90% 65% 29% 6%
22 HUANG Neila 100% 88% 54% 20% 4% -
23 KHAN Alissa 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 57% 18%
24 CHAVAN Arya 100% 100% 97% 81% 48% 16% 2%
25 LIN Nicole 100% 100% 99% 92% 71% 37% 9%
26 HUANG MADELINE 100% 100% 97% 79% 40% 8%
27 MUELLER Amelia D. 100% 95% 67% 26% 5% -
28 GUVEN Coco 100% 100% 98% 85% 51% 14%
29 DILLE Carolina G. 100% 100% 98% 85% 48% 11%
30 CHIN Elise 100% 100% 98% 88% 61% 27% 5%
31 BERNARD Kathryn 100% 95% 73% 39% 12% 2%
32 CHEN Kevy 100% 100% 99% 88% 58% 23% 4%
33 WANG yining 100% 100% 100% 97% 85% 53% 16%
34 LI Alexis 100% 99% 90% 60% 24% 5% -
35 ARNECKE Lauren A. 100% 100% 100% 96% 80% 46% 12%
36 STONE Coral 100% 100% 95% 76% 42% 11%
37 MANKOVA Varvara 100% 98% 85% 56% 22% 4%
38 DANTULURI Shalini 100% 100% 95% 74% 39% 11% 1%
39 NEUMAN Ella 100% 100% 93% 69% 33% 8% 1%
40 NAYAK Antara 100% 73% 25% 4% < 1% - -
41 LOO Kaitlyn 100% 100% 99% 91% 68% 32% 6%
42 FENG Alicia G. 100% 100% 94% 72% 37% 10% 1%
43 TUNG Renee 100% 95% 73% 38% 11% 1%
44 BAWA Anahat 100% 97% 81% 49% 18% 3%
45 DONDERIS Katherine 100% 97% 79% 46% 15% 2%
46 BERMAN greta 100% 97% 83% 51% 18% 3%
47 JOHNSTON Lily 100% 95% 74% 38% 11% 1%
48 SHINCHUK Ellisha 100% 100% 97% 86% 58% 24% 4%
49 YEN Natalie 100% 98% 84% 52% 19% 4% -
50 BARROSO Isabela 100% 94% 71% 36% 11% 2% -
51 TAN Kylie 100% 98% 86% 58% 26% 6% 1%
52 YOUNG Audrey 100% 96% 77% 42% 13% 2%
53 PADANILAM Lily 100% 99% 81% 41% 11% 1%
54 XIE Nora 100% 92% 57% 18% 3% -
55 KANDADAI Lara 100% 96% 78% 45% 15% 2%
56 TA-ZHOU Emma 100% 97% 73% 33% 8% 1%
57 TREACY Aisling 100% 100% 97% 79% 42% 10%
58 PALEO Gabriella 100% 100% 99% 91% 66% 26%
59 FANG Sophie 100% 99% 91% 67% 31% 6%
60 ZHANG Sophie 100% 100% 99% 92% 68% 33% 7%
61 MONTORIO Lily M. 100% 100% 99% 90% 62% 26% 5%
62 CHI Claire 100% 99% 83% 47% 16% 3% -
63 MARGULIAN Maria 100% 96% 73% 36% 10% 2% -
64 PROBASCO Leila 100% 89% 59% 25% 6% 1%
65 DUCKETT Retta 100% 100% 90% 62% 26% 5% -
66 LITTLE Avery 100% 99% 90% 65% 30% 6%
67 MORGAN Lily 100% 28% 3% - - -
68 PAL Anjali G. 100% 98% 85% 54% 21% 3%
69 LAGOON Miriam 100% 98% 85% 56% 23% 5% -
70 LATYSHAVA Stephanie 100% 91% 63% 29% 8% 1% -
71 DE SILVA Augusta 100% 98% 85% 55% 22% 5% -
72 LI Sonia 100% 89% 59% 25% 6% 1% -
73 KHOST Maeve 100% 93% 59% 22% 5% - -
74 DUCKETT Leighton 100% 94% 71% 36% 11% 2% -
74 SHMULER Fiona 100% 85% 50% 18% 4% - -
76 KINKADE Ellie 100% 100% 95% 74% 39% 11% 1%
76 MAROSFOI Virag 100% 24% 3% - - - -
78 DANTULURI Shivani 100% 45% 10% 1% - - -
79 SUHALIM Maree 100% 88% 55% 21% 4% -
80 DEHON Inès 100% 82% 45% 14% 2% -
81 SCHOEW Margot 100% 82% 45% 15% 3% -
81 ONG Lauren 100% 50% 11% 1% - -
83 GERASIMOVA Valeria 100% 42% 8% 1% - - -
83 ZHOU Ziling 100% 66% 21% 3% - - -
85 MILLER Tiffany E. 100% 92% 59% 22% 4% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.