Denison University - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | STREB JR Joseph | - | - | - | 6% | 40% | 53% | |
2 | CHEREDNICHENKO Ihor | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 49% | 37% |
3 | ALLEN Henry | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% |
3 | ZHAO Zhiyong | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 38% | 14% |
5 | COPELAND Nigel | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
6 | GNEUHS Sam | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
7 | CHAN Matthew | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 48% | 36% |
8 | SMITH Brandon | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 34% | 7% | - |
9 | DENMAN Matthew L | - | 6% | 28% | 43% | 21% | 2% | |
10 | BROWN Alex | 1% | 13% | 36% | 36% | 13% | 1% | |
11 | MCCALLEN Cade | - | 6% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 4% | - |
12 | DUNLAP Ian | 4% | 26% | 42% | 24% | 4% | - | |
13 | ROOT-THOMPSON Kiah | 4% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
14 | MICK Gabriel | 16% | 43% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
15 | SIDARAS John | 40% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
16 | LINDOW Connor | 2% | 18% | 40% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
17 | MURDOCK Owen | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% | |
18 | BOWERS Gregory | 11% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
19 | HAAS Zane | 61% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - | |
20 | WILSON Kirk | 43% | 42% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.