Denison University - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | STREB JR Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 53% | |
2 | CHEREDNICHENKO Ihor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 37% |
3 | ALLEN Henry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 24% |
3 | ZHAO Zhiyong | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 14% |
5 | COPELAND Nigel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 3% |
6 | GNEUHS Sam | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 3% |
7 | CHAN Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 36% |
8 | SMITH Brandon | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 7% | - |
9 | DENMAN Matthew L | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 23% | 2% | |
10 | BROWN Alex | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 14% | 1% | |
11 | MCCALLEN Cade | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 28% | 4% | - |
12 | DUNLAP Ian | 100% | 96% | 70% | 28% | 4% | - | |
13 | ROOT-THOMPSON Kiah | 100% | 96% | 71% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
14 | MICK Gabriel | 100% | 84% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
15 | SIDARAS John | 100% | 60% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
16 | LINDOW Connor | 100% | 98% | 79% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - |
17 | MURDOCK Owen | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% | |
18 | BOWERS Gregory | 100% | 89% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
19 | HAAS Zane | 100% | 39% | 6% | - | - | - | |
20 | WILSON Kirk | 100% | 57% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.