Chesapeake Fencing Club - Towson, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SCHAEFER Joshua M. | - | - | - | 6% | 45% | 49% | |
| 2 | GORDON Jacob | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 29% |
| 3 | KEE Andrew L. | - | - | - | 5% | 35% | 61% | |
| 3 | CAMBRIDGE Kendell O. | - | - | 6% | 32% | 47% | 14% | |
| 5 | SOUMAKIS Sarantos G. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 53% | 36% | |
| 6 | CONVERSE Warren D. | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 22% | |
| 7 | GRIEB Oliver | - | 8% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 4% | |
| 8 | SELSER Ella | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 9 | SANTIAGO Elias | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 10 | GORDON Rachel A. | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% | |
| 11 | CONVERSE Madilynn E. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 12 | BAYER John P. | 1% | 16% | 43% | 34% | 5% | - | |
| 13 | LIAO Olivia | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 14 | SEDGLEY Samuel | 6% | 28% | 42% | 22% | 2% | - | |
| 15 | HOE Kenneth Y. | 2% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 16 | MANLAPAZ Jan Vincent | 22% | 46% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
| 17 | SHEA William | 4% | 23% | 42% | 27% | 3% | - | |
| 18 | BLAM Aaron | 2% | 23% | 46% | 26% | 3% | - | |
| 19 | GORDON Jr. Raymond L. | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 20 | NSUBUGA Jeffrey | 4% | 36% | 43% | 15% | 1% | - | |
| 21 | BARCZAK Rebekah | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 22 | HOWELL Thomas | 1% | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 23 | CULP Joshua | 36% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 24 | HU Eric | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 25 | BRINEGAR Brett | 29% | 44% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.