Chesapeake Fencing Club - Towson, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SCHAEFER Joshua M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 49% | |
2 | GORDON Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 29% |
3 | KEE Andrew L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 61% | |
3 | CAMBRIDGE Kendell O. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% | 14% | |
5 | SOUMAKIS Sarantos G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 36% | |
6 | CONVERSE Warren D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 22% | |
7 | GRIEB Oliver | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 4% | |
8 | SELSER Ella | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
9 | SANTIAGO Elias | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
10 | GORDON Rachel A. | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% | |
11 | CONVERSE Madilynn E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
12 | BAYER John P. | 100% | 99% | 83% | 39% | 5% | - | |
13 | LIAO Olivia | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% | |
14 | SEDGLEY Samuel | 100% | 94% | 66% | 24% | 2% | - | |
15 | HOE Kenneth Y. | 100% | 98% | 78% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
16 | MANLAPAZ Jan Vincent | 100% | 78% | 32% | 5% | - | - | |
17 | SHEA William | 100% | 96% | 73% | 31% | 3% | - | |
18 | BLAM Aaron | 100% | 98% | 75% | 29% | 3% | - | |
19 | GORDON Jr. Raymond L. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
20 | NSUBUGA Jeffrey | 100% | 96% | 60% | 16% | 1% | - | |
21 | BARCZAK Rebekah | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | |
22 | HOWELL Thomas | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - |
23 | CULP Joshua | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
24 | HU Eric | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | |
25 | BRINEGAR Brett | 100% | 71% | 27% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.