Brandeis University - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YAO Jintao | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 44% | 14% | |
| 2 | KIM Shaun M. | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 46% |
| 3 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% | |
| 3 | LIN Maxim | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 6% | |
| 5 | YAO Jincheng | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% |
| 6 | SKINNER Graham B. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 43% | 18% |
| 7 | DOLAN Charles R. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 6% |
| 8 | BAE Jason I. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 34% |
| 9 | EFSTATHIOU Evangelos L. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 36% | 39% | 10% |
| 10 | HUANG Tom | - | 8% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 3% | |
| 11 | MORALES Jonathan | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 43% | 25% | |
| 12 | MICHELL Bailey | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 48% | |
| 13 | BONDARENCO Vlad | - | 7% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 4% | |
| 14 | PENG Bryan | - | - | 4% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% |
| 15 | WEBER Mattias A. | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 37% | 14% | 2% |
| 16 | GONG Jerry | 1% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
| 17 | CHUNG Connor | - | 3% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 8% | |
| 18 | WANG Daniel | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 6% | |
| 19 | NOURELDIN Gabriel | - | 1% | 13% | 39% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
| 20 | GINSBERG Jordan | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 3% |
| 21 | PIWOWAR Alex | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 40% | 20% | 3% |
| 22 | BADUSHOV Anton | 2% | 22% | 46% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 23 | MUNGOVAN Matthew | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 24 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 9% | |
| 25 | DUMOULIN Gabriel | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 26 | LAUB William | 23% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | WEN Edward | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
| 28 | MEYERSON Jacob | 7% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 29 | KIM-COGAN Ryan | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 36% | 10% | |
| 30 | SMITH Adam | 12% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 31 | YEN Preston | - | < 1% | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% | |
| 32 | RYAN Kai | 6% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 33 | COUNTS Nicholas | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 34 | DZIALO George A. | 1% | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 35 | PERRON Robert | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
| 36 | CHIN Nigel | 83% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 37 | TAUER Sam | 16% | 47% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | COURTIN Frederic | 8% | 44% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | CHENG Brandon | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 40 | DRZEWICZEWSKI Sean | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | BERGER Jacob | 34% | 46% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 42 | COFFIN Carleton | 7% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 43 | PODDAR Shameek | 53% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 44 | KHOTLINE Daniel | 11% | 37% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 45 | AVRAMIS Adam | 73% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.