Brandeis University - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | HAFEEZ Hania | - | - | 2% | 12% | 42% | 44% |
| 2 | LI Fei | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 3% |
| 3 | BENZAN India | 2% | 17% | 44% | 29% | 7% | - |
| 3 | CALDWELL Phoebe | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 45% |
| 5 | WELLS Tesla M. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 46% | 36% |
| 6 | SMUK Alexandra S. | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 34% | 8% |
| 7 | SEREGIN Katya | 16% | 44% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 8 | YU Nicole J. | - | - | 3% | 21% | 47% | 29% |
| 9 | LUO Ashley | - | - | 2% | 17% | 46% | 34% |
| 10 | SPRINGER Sierra | - | - | 3% | 21% | 49% | 27% |
| 11 | NGUYEN Kira | - | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 47% |
| 12 | ABRAMSON Mariela R. | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
| 13 | DU Eiry | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 14 | HAFEEZ Hiba | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 27% | 5% |
| 15 | SHU Youshan | - | 3% | 21% | 44% | 27% | 5% |
| 16 | WANG Zoe | 4% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 17 | CANNING Charlotte | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% |
| 18 | ETZEL Rowan | 3% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 19 | CAFASSO Natalya | - | 2% | 17% | 40% | 33% | 8% |
| 20 | SONG Angela | - | - | 4% | 23% | 47% | 26% |
| 21 | WESER Veronica U. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
| 21 | RICHARDSON Meredith | 2% | 18% | 40% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 23 | SMITH Grace L. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 38% |
| 24 | FENG Ge | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 43% | 13% |
| 25 | CAMPBELL Anahit M. | - | - | 4% | 23% | 46% | 27% |
| 26 | CHATIKHINE Anastasia | 3% | 38% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 27 | AZMEH nour | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 37% | 10% |
| 28 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 14% | 2% |
| 29 | SMUK Daria A. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 45% | 17% |
| 30 | ERSHOVA Anastasia | 7% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 31 | MONOVA Lilyana | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 32 | PAN Angela | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 33 | ROWLAND May | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 34 | HUZEL Lisa | - | 3% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 6% |
| 35 | PRIHODKO Nina | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
| 36 | MASTRONARDI Laura | 11% | 41% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 37 | MARCHANT Sandra M. | - | 1% | 13% | 39% | 38% | 9% |
| 38 | ZHENG Linden | 1% | 25% | 46% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 39 | GORDET Cristina G. | - | 3% | 18% | 41% | 32% | 7% |
| 40 | DEPOMMIER Isabelle | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 41 | ASHER Valerie | - | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 47% |
| 41 | BYRON Karen J. | 4% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 43 | ROTHMAN-HALL Bronwyn R. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 46% | 37% |
| 43 | LI Suri | 3% | 24% | 43% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 45 | PARSONS Mischa | 4% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 46 | BENNETT Olivia | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 47 | ZOU You yang (Yoyo) | 18% | 43% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 48 | SHEIN Evita | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 49 | NGUYEN Ashley L. | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 50 | TOLLEY Toby | - | 4% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 6% |
| 51 | SAAL Anna | 1% | 10% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 2% |
| 52 | UNGURIANU Nika | 7% | 31% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 53 | CHOY Ida | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
| 53 | PARSONS Leada | 4% | 35% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 55 | HOAGLAND Sally | 29% | 44% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 55 | HOOPER Lucy | 33% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 57 | SKLAR Davida | 71% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 58 | KELLY Diane A. | 47% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | SOTELO Michelle | 10% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 60 | ZUCKER Emily A. | 32% | 49% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 61 | WILLIAMSON Beatrix | 13% | 38% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 63 | COVINO Mila | 84% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 63 | SANLIKOL Suzan | 49% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 65 | RABIDOUX Skyler L. | 45% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 65 | JENSEN MJ | 35% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.