Brandeis University - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | HAFEEZ Hania | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 44% |
2 | LI Fei | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 3% |
3 | BENZAN India | 100% | 98% | 81% | 37% | 7% | - |
3 | CALDWELL Phoebe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 45% |
5 | WELLS Tesla M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 36% |
6 | SMUK Alexandra S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% | 8% |
7 | SEREGIN Katya | 100% | 84% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - |
8 | YU Nicole J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 29% |
9 | LUO Ashley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 34% |
10 | SPRINGER Sierra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 27% |
11 | NGUYEN Kira | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 47% |
12 | ABRAMSON Mariela R. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 5% |
13 | DU Eiry | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
14 | HAFEEZ Hiba | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 32% | 5% |
15 | SHU Youshan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 32% | 5% |
16 | WANG Zoe | 100% | 96% | 72% | 30% | 5% | - |
17 | CANNING Charlotte | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 15% |
18 | ETZEL Rowan | 100% | 97% | 76% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
19 | CAFASSO Natalya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 40% | 8% |
20 | SONG Angela | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 26% |
21 | WESER Veronica U. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
21 | RICHARDSON Meredith | 100% | 98% | 79% | 39% | 9% | 1% |
23 | SMITH Grace L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 38% |
24 | FENG Ge | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 13% |
25 | CAMPBELL Anahit M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 27% |
26 | CHATIKHINE Anastasia | 100% | 97% | 58% | 15% | 2% | - |
27 | AZMEH nour | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% | 10% |
28 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 16% | 2% |
29 | SMUK Daria A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 17% |
30 | ERSHOVA Anastasia | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 4% | - |
31 | MONOVA Lilyana | 100% | 91% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - |
32 | PAN Angela | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - |
33 | ROWLAND May | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 9% | 1% |
34 | HUZEL Lisa | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 37% | 6% |
35 | PRIHODKO Nina | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
36 | MASTRONARDI Laura | 100% | 89% | 48% | 12% | 1% | - |
37 | MARCHANT Sandra M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 47% | 9% |
38 | ZHENG Linden | 100% | 99% | 73% | 27% | 4% | - |
39 | GORDET Cristina G. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 7% |
40 | DEPOMMIER Isabelle | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
41 | ASHER Valerie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% |
41 | BYRON Karen J. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 7% | - |
43 | ROTHMAN-HALL Bronwyn R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 37% |
43 | LI Suri | 100% | 97% | 73% | 30% | 6% | - |
45 | PARSONS Mischa | 100% | 96% | 69% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
46 | BENNETT Olivia | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
47 | ZOU You yang (Yoyo) | 100% | 82% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - |
48 | SHEIN Evita | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - |
49 | NGUYEN Ashley L. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 10% | 1% |
50 | TOLLEY Toby | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% | 6% |
51 | SAAL Anna | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 21% | 2% |
52 | UNGURIANU Nika | 100% | 93% | 63% | 21% | 3% | - |
53 | CHOY Ida | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
53 | PARSONS Leada | 100% | 96% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - |
55 | HOAGLAND Sally | 100% | 71% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
55 | HOOPER Lucy | 100% | 67% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
57 | SKLAR Davida | 100% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - |
58 | KELLY Diane A. | 100% | 53% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
59 | SOTELO Michelle | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 3% | - |
60 | ZUCKER Emily A. | 100% | 68% | 20% | 2% | - | - |
61 | WILLIAMSON Beatrix | 100% | 87% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - |
63 | COVINO Mila | 100% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - |
63 | SANLIKOL Suzan | 100% | 51% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
65 | RABIDOUX Skyler L. | 100% | 55% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
65 | JENSEN MJ | 100% | 65% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.